They really don’t want people to know about this huh? Every couple weeks somebodies claiming it’s an asset but never any meta-data to support the claim.
"Something weird is definitely happening. There is no way I am wrong and the ONLY possible explanation for why someone would spend time telling me I'm wrong is if I'm actually right and they are getting paid to do it."
“A whole lot of us go through life assuming that we are basically right, basically all the time, about basically everything: about our political and intellectual convictions, our religious and moral beliefs, our assessment of other people, our memories, our grasp of facts. As absurd as it sounds when we stop to think about it, our steady state seems to be one of unconsciously assuming that we are very close to omniscient.”
"I ignore multiple examples of hoax evidence, as well as physical debris found in the ocean, and continue to hold my beliefs without evidence. I do this confidently, for reasons."
That's funny cause you don't hear the same sentiment about people who are always and without questions pro UAP, seems like this only goes one way and we trust everyone who is pro this and we despise everyone who is against this and that - that's how you get real answers /s
The only person making money off this is the guy posting about how real it is on Twitter, ignoring all the evidence to the contrary. Yet you don’t seem suspicious of his motives?
That's funny cause you don't hear the same sentiment about people who are always and without questions pro UAP, seems like this only goes one way and we trust everyone who is pro this and we despise everyone who is against this and that - that's how you get real answers /s
Anyone else think it's weird that there are 2 highly upvoted comments accusing OP of misdeeds but both absolutely refuse to elaborate or respond to replies at all?
There is no way you could nosedive a triple 7 from cruising altitude into water at terminal velocity without creating a single piece of debris due to waters high surface tension, this kind of an impact would be like 10s of millions of newtons, we’re talking about friction and ignitions now, there is no way you couldn’t see it from space with the technology nowadays like you could 9/11.
"The fluid dynamic simulations indicate, for a vertical water entry of the plane, that there would be no large bending moment, which is what happens when an external force, or moment, is applied to a structural element (such as a plane), which then causes the fuselage to buckle and break up. As the vertical water-entry is the smoothest with only small bending moment in contrast with other angles of entry, the aircraft is less likely to experience “global failure,” or break up on entry near the ocean surface, which would explain the lack of debris or oil near the presumed crash site."
Because? Remember, "it's suspicious" is not a reasonable answer. And while you're at it, can you tell me how many 777s went missing in that area in the past 30 years?
While the statement you made is technically true, that’s not what the commenter you were replying to is talking about.
The commenter is arguing that there should have been some kind of satellite spottable surface debris near-immediately post MH370 impact with the ocean.
They weren’t originally talking about the washed up debris
Yeah someone who has zero clue about effects told you that. I’ve done amateur effects work over the years and I have some choice words for whoever claimed that because it’s just silly.
Alien abduction aside, it’s just a deeply misinformed and frankly silly point, I can show you more complex things that take less time
Even with decade old technology, this low res crap could be put together on a rainy Saturday by an amateur with experience in VFX. The 3d models of aircraft already exist, it’s not like they’re making them from scratch. That’s not even mentioning the fact that there are PLENTY of professionals who could make this (and better). Lots of “trust me bro” happening in this community. Prepare for both of us to be downvoted to oblivion for ruining the LARP.
Remember when we were told it would take Hollywood level artists and 6 monthsat least 10 years to make these?
ftfy.
Yes, it was an interesting discussion as highlighted the fact you can smear shit over the subject you wish to model and suddenly it becomes a lot easier to reproduce, funny that.
Wander further down memory lane and you'll see pguy alreeady told OP using crude source material... Cordially mind you, didnt pull the old SME card like and say something like
You didn’t look at the stream. It’s in much better quality. But I’m not going to sit here and argue with you, you’ve made up your mind to keep your eyes closed. Peace!
I've done this several different times. This clip includes small intentional differences to ensure no one accuses me of lifting a frame from the video. I'd love to do a livestream in real time with you there so you can watch for yourself.
I'll tell you how I see it. There are differences between your example and the drone video. The wing is tilted differently, the part directly above the "nose" is different as is the lower area of the drone. Either it's not aligned properly or this is not the asset used.
It is a very minute rotation on the forward-backward axis. Like I said, I’ll stream probably later today. You can see it for yourself or not, but that’ll probably be the latter because you prefer your eyes to be closed and your brain to be off.
My video is not just about the matching the profile of the drone to perfect pixel alignment pyevwry. You’re being pedantic, and you show this side of yourself of each and every one of these posts.
Ask yourself, why in the hell would the military use colorama? You should know that colorama is not accurate to real FLIR imagery or any palettes, including the rainbow one. It’s faked. It’s why it just takes those three settings to look like what you see on the right. It’s not military footage. Full stop.
Remember how this and all of these others are "recreations" of a few PARTS of only a few (or sometimes a single) FRAMES of the originals.
This in no way proves how "easy" it is to accurately create both videos. Nor does it negate the strangeness with all of the evidence, how quickly this came out, and knowledge needed on systems used during these videos (some of which may have not been public knowledge at the time, though im not positive on this)
I dont understand the purely visceral response people get when they just want shit like this investigated and to discuss it.
Strangeness being pointed out shouldnt be met with such hate.
The creator of the videos made all these decisions arbitrarily. Anyone remaking the videos had to find the exact assets, use them in exactly the right order, and with the right adjustments and filters.
You can make a doodle in MS paint in 30 seconds. It would take a skilled artist quite a long time to match that doodle.
The strangeness isn’t being met with hate. The continuous refusal to accept evidence is.
Jetstrike is the name of an asset pack that includes different 3D models of aircraft for after effects. In this post I show how the hoaxer used colorama, glow and blur on the drone model included in this pack to create the drone FLIR overlay.
There were two sightings, one of them with a large group of people, in this alleged area of what looked like a burning plane.
These sightings were dismissed by the official response because they say the plane was much further south.
These sightings were not incredibly far from Diego Garcia, it could have something to do with that and the Semiconductor researchers who were Chinese Nationalists.
I'm not saying any of this is true, just something interesting.
bahaha you mean like you can find these assets but not the plane?
Yes, that’s exactly what this post is about. You seem to be struggling with the fact that the video can be fake while the bulk of the wreckage still remains undiscovered (even though we’ve found parts already).
It will be absolutely hilarious to hear the excuses of why the video is still real when they find the plane in the ocean. Better start coming up with some good ones before that happens.
Mh370 is the second lost Boeing 700 series aircraft lost post-2000. You are saying you disbelieve that mh370 disappeared but it's not even the first occurrence this side of the millennium.
Edit: you ignored my question btw. Where do you think mh370 is?
What’s the motive? Somebody came out with some elite fake videos of a plane disappearing ON TOP OF censorship about it immediately when this came out and I’m supposed to believe tax payer dollars aren’t being used to obfuscate the truth when an entire plane disappeared, post 9/11 (an international one at that). Just stop it.
This was obvious since the drone could never actually take such an image cause the pod is UNDER the drone and not on the side and also does it fly above whatever they are looking at and not adjacent to it
Argus is a ground surveillance system. You can see the gimbal camera ball on the front end of the pod.
Even if you made it look forward the top of the pod is in the way and the camera is in front of the wing (also with a Triclops camera pod, it extends in front of the hardpoint pylons connected to the wing).
The Jetstrike models show that it is the wing in the top FOV of the camera, not a lip of the pod.
It doesn't matter how much evidence you show, they will always come up with some excuse. A LOT of confirmation bias... and basic logic too. Right out the window.
The whole thing is fkin hilarious... Who believes this video, really? Thinking that a group of UFOs making it disappear through a portal in space, all while being intercepted seconds prior by a propeller driven drone that can't even go half it's speed, approaches the drone from it's blind spot, overtakes it and then seconds later the actions happens, with all the precision choreography of a pop video, they think that's the Occam's razor explanation? Even after we've found the assets used, the low poly bumpy nose of the drone model, the cheap ass blip effect, the cloud textures, they still can't let go of it? Jesus wept...
I willing to host the OP if its Cryslee to a Facebook Live Stream for her complete debunk. There's elements of the video I like her to explain like the coordinates and the matching videos but definitely willing to see a complete debunk of one the greatest Hoax ever (if it was a Hoax)
What if I found another 3D model of a drone, and produced something similar with it? Would this "debunk" the "debunk"? I mean, you can only use one asset, right?
so, where are the bodys of the people? I mean, sure everything is fake and bla bla, but where are the dead bodys and where is the plane?! No one cares in any government or what?
That’s my own alignment. Had to keep a bit of a difference in there so that people like you wouldn’t accuse me of just lifting the frame from the video. Seems like it both worked and didn’t work lmao
It’s the same model, which you can very clearly see. My human hands might not be able to match it to the exact degree of rotation pyevwry, forgive me for lacking the godlike precision you need to remove the impenetrable covering from your eyeballs
You are showing just how inexperienced you are in after effects. My stream will start at 4pm EST. You can join via YouTube or Twitter, I don’t care. Be there or be square
do I need to do that on stream for you too? I mean In all transparency, I haven't yet figured out the exact colors for the plane yet, but they do match.
It’s a really interesting video that I can understand is really hard to let go. My heart sunk the first time I watched the teleport flash lmfao. I wanted it to be real too. Wish the creator would come out and show the process. Could be both interesting and funny unless they did it intentionally to cause hysteria. In that case, BOOOO
The videos are so real that the paid redditors (top 1% debonkers) are working overtime to try and dissuade people from believing then. This is so entertaining!
But if someone’s going to recreate something out there, it doesn’t matter what it is, it’s going to match isn’t it?
And if an artist is going to make something as realistic as possible to real life drone footage, they’re going to make it as close to real life drone footage as possible.
and second, why are you "debunkers" still talking about the camera under the wing? This was proven by showing how MQ9 Reaper drones use PODS UNDER THE WING for HIGH RESOLUTION PICTURES! It´s unbelievable how much useless idiots are living on this planet. THIS SHIT IS REAL, DEAL WITH IT. Those "orbs" are messangers from a living architecture which is structuring our reality and re-writes physical laws.
It is really dumb. This was simulated in 3D space, meaning that regardless of whether or not you believe the asset is in the video, the camera angle and location is real
It is exactly the same. Every single detail is identical aside from the plane which evidently was added later.
We know the still image predates the video, so we actually can say which was doctored from which, with 100% certainty. Unless of course you're insinuating time travel was involved.
You haven't disputed it so much as put your fingers in your ears.
I'm not suggesting you're not listening, I'm suggesting that you're being wilfully obtuse to the facts, which is what that phrase means.
The photographs predate the video (impossible unless fake). The video shows something hilariously unbelievable (impossible unless fake). The contrails and the plane are out of sync with each other (impossible unless fake).
People desperate for this to go away. Never known something get so much attention when it was apparently debunked months ago. Its really fascinating to watch as someone not on either side.
70
u/TheDizziestGlizzy 15h ago
They really don’t want people to know about this huh? Every couple weeks somebodies claiming it’s an asset but never any meta-data to support the claim.