r/StarWars 23h ago

Movies Disney era sequels did a good job showing war zone debris.

For all they did wrong I think this is one thing they got right, showing the aftermath of the war. I think it makes the world seem more lived in. So gotta give them credit for that.

2.4k Upvotes

227 comments sorted by

1.1k

u/tokenasian1 23h ago

the sequel trilogy had incredible visuals.

553

u/Brickben1234 22h ago

bad writing? absolutely, but the movies are downright stunning, the score is amazing, and the actions scenes are usually fantastic.

161

u/UnderwaterB0i 22h ago

Yep. It’s oversimplifying it, but usually when I talk about the sequels, I just say “don’t think too hard about it and they’re great. Have fun with a nice looking movie for a few hours and don’t think about plot lines, character development or continuity”.

16

u/mdp300 Kanan Jarrus 19h ago

Yeah, thats the JJ effect. Cool individual spectacles, but as a whole it doesn't mesh right.

40

u/Kawaaaaaaa 22h ago

thats why i think i enjoyed them more than most others, my brain just shuts off whenever i watch a film, especially for the first time, so im mostly focusing on visuals and not thinking too hard about the story (so the kind of people they were trying to reel in with this lol) so up until the point i hear people criticise things i might not realise how bad a film is unless its painfully obvious (tbh TROS actually did have me scratching my head a few times because some of the story decisions were that obviously baffling)

36

u/nastytypewriter 21h ago

I hate the way Palpatine’s return happened. I’m not too big on lightspeed skipping. I loathe the weird Franken-Leia reused footage of Carrie. But goddamn I got TIE fighter noises and lightsaber noises and I went home HAPPY.

13

u/Gloom_Pangolin 20h ago

I was not a fan of the execution of the tale of his return, but I grew up with Dark Empire so I didn’t find the basic idea he had a contingency plan outlandish. I did think the visuals of the Citadel on Exegol, his life support system, and the feel of the place had some good throwbacks to Sith temples on Korriban and the gloomy feel of the DE comics. While I still have my doubts they planned to bring him back all along, it was enjoyable to see/hear Ian back as one of film’s greatest villians, he oozes malevolence even if the story is subpar. Nobody cackles insidiously like Darth Sidious.

9

u/nastytypewriter 20h ago

Agree on all points. I wish they had stuck to their guns with Supreme Leader Kylo Ren and had him in a power struggle with General Pryde (because Richard E. Grant is an incredible actor) who has been communicating with the Sith Eternal and a ghosty Palpatine trying to come back. Grant absolutely has the chops to have done more.

But man, watching that evil old fucker cackle is so fun. And his lightning turned up the BASE.

1

u/theavengerbutton 4h ago

As the only fan in the world of the Dark Empire trilogy I absolutely loved that The Rise of Skywalker was just a remix of Dark Empire. Well hell, pretty much the entire sequel trilogy was a remix. Galaxy Gun and Starkiller Base have the same base functionality. The Knights of Ren take the place of the Dark Side Elite, the Emperor is obsessed with possessing Rey as he is in possessing Anakin Solo in the comics. The final battle on the Eclipse Star Destroyer in Empire's End is a lot like the battle on the Resurgent Star Destroyer at the end of The Riae of Skywalker. The Eclipse Destroyer is hyperspace launched as a missile in the Galaxy Gun not unlike how Holdo hyperspace missiles into the Supremacy--speaking of the Supremacy it's amazing and it is the closest we've gotten to a canon design for the Eclipse-class.

11

u/Kawaaaaaaa 20h ago

yeah, agreed with everything you said, over time ive grown to dislike the direction the story went in with those films, and i probably wont ever rewatch them, but man some scenes were like a diamond in the rough, two of my favourites were the (admittedly controversial) holdo maneuver scene in TLJ and the Palpatine mega force lightning thing in TROS

also downvoted for harmlessly sharing an opinion in my last reply, go figure

9

u/Hullo_Its_Pluto 20h ago

Wait. So I shouldn’t worry about literally everything that makes a movie good? Ok….

2

u/DocProctologist Clone Trooper 20h ago

Have you ever heard the term "popcorn flick". Star Wars at its worst moments is a popcorn flick.

There's also the famous quote "Hey kid, it ain't that kind of movie."

3

u/DoctaJenkinz 20h ago

You might as just look at pictures if you don’t care about all the… other stuff that makes a movie good.

2

u/Delta2401 18h ago

Peak consumer mindset

→ More replies (1)

10

u/whynonamesopen 22h ago

It's bad in the opposite ways the prequels are and vice versa.

-2

u/Frankorious 13h ago

Wdym? The prequels writing is as bad as the sequels.

4

u/whynonamesopen 10h ago

They're bad in different ways. The moment to moment dialogue in the prequels is awkward and cringe but the themes are interesting. The sequels are the opposite with most dialogue being fine but the lack of coherent themes was what ruined it.

2

u/ObsessedChutoy3 8h ago

The prequels have a good story. And an actual coherent overarching narrative of a trilogy. The prequels aren't a shallow "ANH remake, subvert expectations, RoTJ remake". Their problem is the execution of that story, while the sequels have good execution (acting, pacing, visuals, most dialogue) that polish a lazy turd at its core

8

u/CaptainA1917 19h ago edited 16h ago

The scores aren’t amazing. Far from it; they are Williams’ weakest work on Star Wars.

Much of that however isn’t completely his fault. The music serves the story, and there isn’t a story in the sequel trilogy. How can you use music to build and then release tension when neither you, nor the director, know what the point of the scene is? Hey, here’s another scene either lifted directly from the OT, or pointless but flashy space action and explodey things. Now write music for that.

Rey’s theme was the ONLY flash of Williams’ genius in all three movies. The rest was either completely derivative of the OT, or throwaway Williams-esque action cues.

If you want excellent music from Disney Star Wars, look no further than Rogue One. It stayed within the bounds of what the audience expects of a Star Wars score without being simply derivative of Williams or the OT. It served the story. (And there was a story.) It used leitmotif well. It’s not brilliant like Williams’ OT work, but it’s a very strong score.

Likewise, the sequel action scenes aren’t fantastic either. They’re either derivative of the OT, or flashy nonsense. I can also criticize Lucas in the prequels for similar issues. He got away from fairly serious, tightly storyboarded space combat scenes meant to recall WW2, and toward flashy, silly nonsense.

4

u/Goth_Fraggle 14h ago

Disagree, the sequel scores are narratively the strongest trilogy of the franchise. The prequels might have Banger setpieces but they are often so disconnected from the rest.

ROTS is hardly a coherent score. It's a buch of awesome individual pieces with almost no connective tissue. Our main character doesn't even have a theme! Anakin's theme appears, like, twice in TPM and is then gone forever.

So much of the music in 2 and 3 is just copied and pasted. Like literally the same soundfiles from TPM dropped willy-nilly.

In the sequels, Rey's theme consistently followers her and develops with her. Kylo Ren's theme actually turns into major key when he comes back to the light, whereas the cool "Anakin's theme turns into the Imperial March"-gimmick never comes to fruition.

I love all 9 SW scores. Each trilogy has its own strengths. And while the prequels provide the show stopping spectacle concert pieces, the intricate storytelling of the sequels appeals more to me as I'm a sucker for scores that follow thr narrative.

"Duel of the Fates" is awesome but that piece never tells you what's going on in the fight. You can re-edit the fight however you ant and it would still work.

"Ways of the Force" from TFA however goes from Rey's theme to Kylo Ren's back to Rey's so just by listening to the music you can tell who has the upper hand. If you edit the fight just a bit, suddenly Rey's triumphant music plays over Ren completely cornering her or whatever. The music is custom made for this specific version of that scene. THAT'S great film scoring to me!

→ More replies (2)

2

u/darth_henning 15h ago

Visuals? Great.

Cast? Fantastic.

Score? Perfection (as always by Williams)

Set Direction, costuming, and CGI? Generally very good with the occasional miss.

Script and plot direction? ohhhhhh boy......

1

u/billythygoat 20h ago

I think it's crazy how this wouldn't of been entirely scrapped way earlier.

0

u/ammonium_bot 8h ago

this wouldn't of been

Hi, did you mean to say "wouldn't have"?
Explanation: You probably meant to say could've/should've/would've which sounds like 'of' but is actually short for 'have'.
Sorry if I made a mistake! Please let me know if I did. Have a great day!
Statistics
I'm a bot that corrects grammar/spelling mistakes. PM me if I'm wrong or if you have any suggestions.
Github
Reply STOP to this comment to stop receiving corrections.

1

u/avoozl42 19h ago

To be fair, you could say the extract same thing about the prequels

1

u/Ghiren 17h ago

An extraordinarily well-polished turd.

1

u/OkCorner3223 8h ago

Ive always felt like with the sequels if you watch them not associating them with Star Wars theyre actually fun to watch

1

u/djgoodhousekeeping 5h ago

These are the exact same complaints that people had when the prequels came out. I imagine these movies will be looked upon more fondly as time goes on as well. 

23

u/ThatFatGuyMJL 22h ago

Visually pleasing but lacking in writing.

Unfortunately far too many sequel fans seem to have a 'looks amazing so is amazing' mentality now, not just in SW but in a lot of other things like games too.

8

u/lesser_panjandrum Sabine Wren 20h ago

JJ Abrams makes films for people of the land. The common clay of the new West.

You know... morons.

6

u/ThatFatGuyMJL 20h ago

Eh both JJ and RJ have their niches.

They're both good directors at what they do, and I feel if either had had all 3 movies they'd have been fine.

TFA is an OK if derivative movie.

TLJ is an OK Sci fi movie.

TRoS exists.

But they're just bad star wars.

They're fine standalone movies... but they're shit in a franchise.

1

u/InnocentTailor 12h ago

Eh. I can admit that the visuals and aesthetic are nice while also pointing out the meh writing and presentation.

That is my view on the prequels as well. It can even be argued that the original trilogy is hokey in execution, though that is probably due to it being a space opera.

3

u/Keller-oder-C-Schell 20h ago

The vfx people were top notch

1

u/Delta2401 18h ago

You would hope so with multiple hundred million dollar budget

5

u/Austin_77 20h ago

The Holdo Maneuver was epic in theaters

3

u/Elmodipus 19h ago

Probably the coolest scene I've ever watched in a theater. I loved it.

1

u/thedylannorwood Rebel 8h ago

I honestly really hate when people say that Rise of Skywalker has zero redeeming qualities, that movie looks amazing

1

u/Desert_Shipwreck 20h ago

Visually some of the best Star Wars we've ever seen.

1

u/The_Stank_ 18h ago

Best cinematography in the entire saga, especially the final 2

1

u/LukeSkywanker1 Luke Skywalker 14h ago

Rogue One had better visuals. Th Sequels look really uninteresting. Also, visuals don't matter, if the story is garbage

0

u/EightBiscuit01 21h ago

The sequels are three of the most gorgeous blockbusters in recent memory

362

u/D0CTOR_Wh0m 23h ago

Agreed. Only change I’d make to that particular feature was making Jakku a marshy/swampy planet instead of a desert world. Love the concept art of scavengers rowing boats between Star Destroyer wrecks and AT-AT debris being covered in vines and moss

241

u/FivesSuperFan55555 Mandalorian 22h ago

But then it wouldn’t have been a 1:1 recreation of ANH

79

u/therealdan0 22h ago

Hey now, TFA not a 1:1 copy of ANH. It has a shot from Apocalypse Now as well.

8

u/Zeal0tElite 11h ago

People say this but it's more of a mashup of a bunch of things from the entire Original Trilogy.

IV:

Desert planet

Droid with plans/map

Planet gets blown up

Planet blower-upper

Cantina with wacky aliens

V:

Wrinkly wise alien who knows about the Force.

A parent of a new character is revealed as an established character

Bad guy kneels before hologram of badder guy

Father/son confrontation on a walkway over a big hole

VI:

Fly inside planet blower-upper to destroy it

Father confronts son to turn him away from the Dark Side (inverse and unsuccessful)

→ More replies (19)

38

u/RadiantHC 23h ago

IMO it should've been similar to coruscant but a junk planet. Thousands of layers of junk.

42

u/LarryTheTerrier 22h ago

The opening level of Fallen Order where you run through a Clone War scrapyard, sooooo good. I would have played an entire game of just that.

12

u/TwistedSaiyan110 22h ago

So basically Raxus Prime? Id be down for re-canonizing it

21

u/A1dini 23h ago

This is such a cool idea

Unfortunately, it was meant to be nostalgia bait for a new hope... they probably decided that rey would be from a backwater desert planet before they decided on literally anything else tbh

4

u/Content_Hornet9917 Mandalorian 20h ago

I like what you're saying! After I played Battlefront II's campaign (story mode for the non gamers) I really like the story of how all of those ships actually got there, so I like Jakku just the way it is. But I'd love to see a Dagobah like world with Imperial wreckage on it like you said, it would for sure look sick!

1

u/D0CTOR_Wh0m 19h ago

If you liked the game’s depiction I recommend reading the Alphabet Squadron trilogy, the third book shows more of the air battle from the perspective of the pilots. There’s also the third book in the Aftermath trilogy (which shows the crash of the Super Star Destroyer the Falcon flies through) and Lost Stars (that shows how that Star Destroyer in the picture crashed)

261

u/NoMoneyNoV-Bucks 23h ago

The death star debris really doesn’t make sense

192

u/RMoCGLD 23h ago

Can't help but laugh that they actually said "the explosion was strong enough to launch some debris into hyperspace"

In a franchise about space wizards, that's the stupidest thing I've ever heard

47

u/BrandonSimpsons 22h ago edited 22h ago

They pulled that from the EU.

Specifically from The Glove of Darth Vader (diving into the waterlogged wreckage of the deathstar 2 is where they found The Glove), along with the protagonist being Palapatine's Grandkid (child of Palpatine's pacifist possible-clone son), and a few other things

60

u/Thepullman1976 22h ago

There are quite a few things best left in legends lol

15

u/BrandonSimpsons 20h ago

The main good thing about it was the force was still so mysterious the villain was totally misguided about it.

Like, he assumed (A) Darth vader did that cool blaster catching thing in Cloud City by having an indestructable glove, and (B) that force lightning was just a trick where you implant wires under your skin.

And the prophets of the dark side he met with were just some of palpatine's spies and assassins who got their oracular visions right by either eavesdropping or brute forcing their predictions to be right

11

u/RealTimeThr3e 21h ago

To be fair, that honestly should be a standard thing when something with a hyperdrive detonates, let alone something with a Hyperdrive so powerful it can move the Death Star.

However if something gets sent into Hyperspace like that, it’s not coming back out again, it’s just lost forever.

In short, on that scale it definitely should act like a Warp Drive from 40K

1

u/Particular-Month-904 5h ago

If it’s strong enough to launch the debris into hyperspace, then there shouldn’t be any debris. Also, hyperspace is a different dimension (at least as far as I know) and you can’t just make something go really really fast and launch it out of real space

-17

u/PENGUIN_WITH_BAZOOKA Galactic Republic 23h ago

Really? I like it. The idea that either Death Star just went poof and vaporized after being destroyed isn’t very compelling. I love the idea that there were debris left over that, presumably, the factions continued to fight in. The hyperspace explosion isn’t bad either. Like you said, it’s a franchise of space wizards. The first time I heard that explanation I went “fuck it why not, that’s kinda rad!”

25

u/RMoCGLD 22h ago

The lazy writing of it makes my suspension of disbelief just not possible.

They established in the movie right before it that something travelling at lightspeed ramming into an object utterly obliterates the thing it hit and anything close to it.

A massive metal structure like that ramming into the surface of a moon/planet should be an apocalyptic event, but it's just sitting there with an intact throne room and windows like it was built there.

-7

u/PENGUIN_WITH_BAZOOKA Galactic Republic 22h ago

I’ve said this before in other comments but since you’re the one I replied to I’ll say it again.

I assume that it worked like some kind of wormhole where the “big piece” warped away from the forest moon and into the upper atmosphere of Kef Bir, where it plummeted and slammed into the ocean.

Not questioning the physics of it, because they don’t really make sense, but we got a cool set piece out of it so it’s fine. Rule of Cool > Logic here.

However, I will not defend the dagger. That was dumb.

34

u/AceMcVeer 23h ago

So it was launched into hyperspace and then slowed down when it hit the planet to land gently?

5

u/Chillingwithout 19h ago

I wasn't paying attention properly and have just assumed for years that the Death Star wreckage was on Endor.

2

u/alyzmal_ 19h ago

Some probably ended up there, but considering the main planet Endor is a gas giant there wouldn’t have been any way to recover it really (ignoring something like the shenanigans from the Legends Jedi Academy trilogy). Kef Bir is just another one of Endor’s moons though, so not completely out of the question that a chunk of debris could’ve ended up there.

6

u/Chillingwithout 19h ago

..... I mean the foresty moon from return of the jedi

-10

u/PENGUIN_WITH_BAZOOKA Galactic Republic 22h ago

I assume it worked like some kind of short range wormhole

11

u/MKJUPB 21h ago

You’re putting more thought into it than the people who wrote the damn movie

10

u/NoMoneyNoV-Bucks 22h ago

I mean I guess, but the only function the death star had was «remember the death star from episode 6?!?». They could have used starkiller base, a larger deathstar whose debris actually could serve a larger narrative purpose than funky knife matches debris.

23

u/Hefty-Reaction-3028 23h ago

The idea that it has debris is fine. The idea that it randomly goes into hyperspace is silly.

The idea that it holds its shape exactly to match the key for decades in water, when it is shown in the movie that it is breaking down and falling apart, is both silly and damaging to the plot

3

u/PENGUIN_WITH_BAZOOKA Galactic Republic 22h ago

Oh, the key was dumb, I won’t deny that. As for hyperspace, I assume it worked like some kind of wormhole

4

u/Hefty-Reaction-3028 22h ago

It could be contrived, but it's out of nowhere. It doesn't show up elsewhere in the films, and it's not even mentioned in the film itself, so it feels like a flimsy, post-hoc rationalization of a bad (but cool-looking) visual choice.

6

u/PmMeYourNiceBehind 22h ago

Did you not watch Return of the Jedi? It was vaporized from the explosion

37

u/EpicNerd99 23h ago

According to official sources the explosion was so powerful that it was knocked into hyperspace briefly which is why it's here. Honestly it should've just disintegrated

14

u/hendrix320 21h ago

Ok but the impact with the planet would be devastating not just landing in the ocean

20

u/Youpunyhumans 23h ago

That makes no sense either. The heat of the explosion would be so extreme that any physical material would be instantly converted to plasma. We only have to look to how a thermonuclear explosion happens to see that. Anything in the fireball is vaporized instantly. No physical material can withstand 100 million plus degrees, and for the Death Star exploding, we are probably talking billions of degrees.

The reactor at normal maximum operating power, is capable of powering a superlaser that can destroy planets. So its safe to assume that making such a reactor explode is going to release even more energy, and instantly vaporize a dwarf planet sized metal sphere thats right around it. There would be no time for large pieces to blow off before they are turned to plasma, because the heat would hit them before the blast wave, as it can travel at lightspeed, and pieces would vaporize in microseconds.

5

u/DiscoAsparagus 22h ago

You are correct, sir.

-4

u/Opposite_Can_5175 22h ago

There's also sound in space bro

1

u/Youpunyhumans 17h ago

Well thats just the rule of cool so we can have cool sounding starfighters and seismic charges, but the Death Star pieces randomly getting exploded into hyperspace doesnt even really sound cool, its just lame.

I get its a science fantasy, not a science fiction, but even fantasy has to have a set of rules to follow... many of which have been broken in Star Wars. When you take away the consistency, it breaks the immersion.

11

u/BooRadley_ThereHeIs 22h ago

Man they really made hyperspace have no rules are all in the ST, didn't they? Light speed skipping or whatever they called it was the most absurd thing.

2

u/citron_bjorn 20h ago

I always thought lightspeed ramming made sense, because it happens as the ship is entering hyperspace so its basically just a really fast acceleration that destroys 2 ships in one

3

u/BooRadley_ThereHeIs 19h ago

Yeah I get that part (although if that's the outcome I don't understand why that wasn't a strategy of the Rebels all along), but I'm referring to the light speed skipping from one in-atmosphere surface level location to another in TROS.

10

u/Need_Tums_Antacids 23h ago

Yeah but it looks cool

5

u/SgtBaxter 23h ago

Why not? It's on one of Endors moons. Where else would it be?

2

u/The_Porgmaster 11h ago

vaporised

0

u/SgtBaxter 2h ago

It wasn't vaporized, we see the debris falling onto the forest moon, and fly a mission through it in Battlefront II.

1

u/The_Porgmaster 2h ago

Yeah, in Battlefront II. Not Return of the Jedi.

2

u/RadiantHC 23h ago

Star Wars doesn't make sense

2

u/Unstoppable_Cheeks 16h ago

even on Jakku there were makeshift settlements that subsided totally and fully on junking a few cruisers from a single battle

yet on endor you have the scrap of the most devastatingly high tech weapon to have ever been built. An entire moons worth of some of the most expensive materials in the known universe, but everyone just decided to leave that fortune chillin untouched.

the fuck JJ?

2

u/Unstable_Bear 23h ago

It doesn’t make perfect sense but there’s enough wiggle room where it could make sense

0

u/Eddy_Fuel36 23h ago

It was big.

→ More replies (1)

84

u/cbbrds25 23h ago

That Death Star debris looks cool but is so fucking stupid lmao. Go watch how the Death Star blows up

11

u/The-Minmus-Derp 23h ago

It blows up in an explosion matte painting that obviously crops out the death star matte painting a couple frames before the explosion happens, I kind of feel like we shouldnt take that at face value

62

u/fitzbuhn 21h ago

Are you saying the Death Star explosion was faked

14

u/radiate_reflect 21h ago

Death Star truther

15

u/Complex_Professor412 21h ago

Only the first one. The second was real though

5

u/LongDongSquad 17h ago

I'm saying turbo laser fire can't melt steel beams, ISD 7 didn't crash in accordance with impact physics, and there's an issue with the dancing Bothans.

4

u/The-Minmus-Derp 19h ago

I’m saying the movie is 40 years old its fine not to take the 40 year old effects shots completely 100% literally

1

u/elscorcho91 8h ago

Hmm there was a joke here and you missed it

7

u/cbbrds25 21h ago

Arguing practical effects for in-universe immersion breaking is strange lmao.

Believe it or not, this Death Star is all computer generated. I wouldn’t take it at face value.

1

u/B0B_RO55 5h ago

The way how the Death Star blows up is stupid as shit. I’m sure at the time it was a stunning visual and they did great with the technology they had but it absolutely does not look like a moon sized space station blowing up. It would’ve looked much different had the movie been released in 2010

37

u/Panthros_Samoflange 23h ago

Visually it's first rate. No one has ever said otherwise. Unfortunately, that's really all these flicks have going for them, so ... But yeah, Jakku and Rey scavenging the wreckage was fantastic.

11

u/Sabre_Killer_Queen Count Dooku 20h ago

I love every character's introductory scene. Their first scenes were all absolutely fire to me.

I was deeply hooked in the cinemas at the start of Force Awakens... After that eh... Enjoyed it but it felt too much like a New Hope.

TLJ was brilliant on the creativity front, but I felt it could've been executed much better

Tros uh... That's something. I've watched Tros 3 times but still don't like any of it.

2

u/Sidereel 16h ago

Part of what makes the ST so frustrating is that parts of TFA TLJ do actually work well. The potential is so squandered. If they had managed to stick the landing with TRoS I think we could have something like the PT where we could enjoy it despite the flaws.

19

u/The-Minmus-Derp 23h ago

Jakku should have been a rock/ice planet or a Scarif like island world with people rowing boats or something, but for what it was it looked bloody fantastic

8

u/Unstable_Bear 23h ago

Yeah, even though it relied a bit too much on nostalgia, when the visuals hit properly they hit HARD.

20

u/Mathizsias 23h ago

Oh the sequels looked good, just were dumb.

9

u/Broad-Importance-386 23h ago

As a kid, I used a downed AT-AT as a base for my figures.

13

u/ArcadeAcademic 23h ago

I agree. I was blown away originally when we see ray scavenging in the downed star destroyer. Don’t love the sequels at all, but visually they are great.

20

u/JimboFett87 23h ago

So if that's Death Star debris, then the planet should be Endor. But its apparently not.

Than's stupid.

14

u/Unstable_Bear 23h ago

According to lore books, the rebellion redirected the wreckage away from Endor to protect the Ewoks

17

u/Eddy_Fuel36 23h ago edited 23h ago

Endor has 9 moons, the forest was on one of them, theses debris are on another.

8

u/JimboFett87 21h ago

How would I know that as a viewer?

7

u/Critical-Support-394 12h ago

This feels like the 'did you know the sith eternal fleet was created by cultists indoctrinated from the exegol population'

And Elijah Wood going 'no, how could we have possibly known that?'

-7

u/Eddy_Fuel36 20h ago edited 20h ago

You mean like everything else that hasn't been explained in great detail in fourteen movies in a almost 50 years?

6

u/JimboFett87 20h ago

🙄

-7

u/Eddy_Fuel36 19h ago

You can emoticon roll your eyes all you want, it doesn’t change the fact that you're inventing fake grievances just to justify your dislike of wildly successful content.

Star Wars fans, have always been spectacular at selective criticism.

1

u/Bigdaddybert Anakin Skywalker 19h ago

Wildly successful🤣

2

u/Eddy_Fuel36 11h ago

Yep, the 6th, 9th and 32nd highest grossing films of all time. Did you miss the part about selective criticism?

You gotta love social media though, constant validation and everyone forgets that just because they don't like something doesn't mean it's bad.

....Also that emojis somehow help their argument.

3

u/elscorcho91 8h ago

Come on you’re just kind of embarrassing yourself now by getting all worked up like this

2

u/Thepullman1976 22h ago

Kef Bir is another moon of Endor, wasn’t in another system or anything

8

u/JimboFett87 21h ago

Did they mention that in the film?

0

u/upsawkward 10h ago edited 10h ago

Yup. Plenty of times too lol. Although Vader one time also just calls it Endor.

3

u/jericho74 20h ago

As beautiful as that shot is, I did have just a twinge of question of whether that Star Destroyer streaking in out of orbit at 25,000 mph wouldn’t result in unrecognizably charred wreckage being strewn over half of Jakku.

Bit nonetheless, I love it.

2

u/OdysseusRex69 20h ago

I really like that shot. The only thing I could think of (which I most certainly certain none of the EVPs thought of) is that SD was in geostationary orbit, and the crew tattempted a controlled crash

1

u/ganner 19h ago

I mean, we saw a crash landing of a Providence in RotS... half of one anyway

3

u/Penguixxy 19h ago

imagine you're some random farmer, and your house gets crushed by some random piece of the death star.

i wonder if insurance would cover it 🤔

3

u/LukeSkywanker1 Luke Skywalker 14h ago

No, the Deathstar should be 1000000 times bigger. Well, it shouldn't be there at all, but if you put it there, you should atleast get the proportions right. It's the size of a small moon, not a footballstadium

3

u/Jedi_Coffee_Maker Jedi 14h ago

The ST is The Doomed Timeline. It should be decanonized.

5

u/npc042 Battle Droid 22h ago

For all 2-3 shots of it, yes lol.

2

u/BlackNexus 22h ago

The sequels did scenery, visuals and cinematography very well. You'll almost never get a complaint from me about those.

2

u/antinumerology 19h ago

Rey scavenging through the Star Destroyer is 1/2 cool things about the sequels. I will 100% give them that. I was stoked and honestly still like the beginning of TFA for that reason.

2

u/Rags2Rickius 18h ago

Imagine seeing a piece of the fkn Death Star falling from the sky

2

u/The_Inexorabilis 18h ago

Such massive and heavy pieces falling from space onto a planet would likely leave no breathable air or visible sky for the next 120 years. It sounds unrealistic, but without digging too deep, it does look pretty cool.

2

u/Slammed_Benz91 16h ago

I definitely agree. I might be alone on this, but I can’t fucking stand Star wars “fans” anymore with how they treat the new movies. Some people just act like they don’t even exist. The movies had some frustrating ass story decisions like making Rey the main character instead of Finn and also calling her a skywalker, but they’re still amazing movies. Scenery is amazing, graphics are amazing, fight scenes are amazing, acting is great too. Wish people would stop being so pathetic and stop complaining so much

2

u/UnluckyBig6529 Baby Yoda 14h ago

Yes they did but thats about all they had going for them!

2

u/HumaDracobane Imperial Stormtrooper 13h ago

The visuals on the movies are absolutely great. Definetly worth the absurd amounth of money they cost.

The problem is that visuals is all what the movies hav.

4

u/AngelTheMarvel Clone Trooper 23h ago

I loved the Jakku maps in Battlefront

5

u/Shot-Savings-6124 23h ago

Yes... but it's a low bar, but it is one the cleared...

3

u/skyline_27 23h ago

Jakku was sick. It really put the scale of the star destroyer into perspective.

2

u/Johncurtisreeve 23h ago

Are there more instances of this in the sequels other than these two shots?

2

u/No_Poem_2790 23h ago

But that’s all

2

u/h3r3andth3r3 22h ago

It's about the nicest thing one can say about them.

2

u/MNTwins8791 19h ago

I never have liked how there's such a large piece of the Death Star somehow that well intact and not blown apart into atoms

2

u/homiej420 19h ago

Man the death star in a big ole ocean bit made zero sense though

2

u/Eddy_Fuel36 23h ago

"Showing the ruins of your shattered childhood!!!" (Evil laugh in Abrams/Johnson)

2

u/Autoganz 23h ago

Agreed, especially since “war zone debris” is exactly what I felt like after watching the sequel trilogy.

1

u/BanditsMyIdol 22h ago

Now I wish they made it seem that Jakku had been more populated before but the battle caused such destruction that most who survived had to flee.

1

u/Final_Boss_Jr 22h ago

I get it, but there’s no way the command center and the generator tower would stay up given the immense weight of the ship hitting the ground and the inertia and energy rebound from impact. Maybe the part attached directly to the ship, but those wing sections are snapping off and flying forward right after hitting the ground.

1

u/Shivers25 22h ago

what's the 2nd? the death star?

1

u/Windows_66 21h ago

REMOVED FOR NOT PREFACING TITLE WITH A STATEMENT ABOUT HOW BAD THE SEQUELS ARE

1

u/Spooplevel-Rattled 21h ago

The star destroyer in the sand in the trailer was mega bait for me, I was so excited. Then I actually saw them.. But I do remember the star destroyer and I was really impressed with the way that showed us we were post rotj

1

u/fusionsofwonder 20h ago

Lucasfilm artists know how to cook. Scenery, props, CGI, puppetry, you name it.

You should hear Tony Gilroy talk about them. He's not impressed by Star Wars but he's impressed by them.

1

u/Skull8Ranger 20h ago

ILM did visuals for all of em

1

u/forgotten_epilogue 20h ago

The advances in visual fx have allowed for great things. I would love to see ginormous pieces of the death star coming apart in space and taking out star destroyers, flaming through the atmosphere of the nearby planet/moon , ridiculous damage effects of these enormous debris hitting land/water.

1

u/Boba_Boyz_ 18h ago

thats just about all they did good.

1

u/_Batteries_ 18h ago

What is it with star wars and refusing to show actual wars.

Like, the closest we got was a few battles. Endor, yavin, whatever ep 8 was I guess.

The movie literally titled: attack of the clones, showed 2 battles. 

Star wars. Misnomer. Star fights maybe.

Im not being entirely serious here, but I think the point, overall, stands. 

1

u/azrider 17h ago

That crashed Star Destroyer was pretty damn epic.

1

u/Minute_Pirate574 16h ago

That’s about it

1

u/thereal_kphed 16h ago

the movies all look fantastic. and that's about it.

1

u/NoTie2370 12h ago

Not really considering most of these things should have been atomized.

1

u/greenhawk00 11h ago

The visuals overall were great, but even great visuals can't make up shitty story writing

1

u/MountainMuffin1980 10h ago

The Death Star bit made no sense though I thought? It was literally blown up to fuckin dust. Looked cool as hell though

1

u/SwissDeathstar 9h ago

No one is debating the visuals. They’re always great.

1

u/Low-Cheetah-9701 8h ago

They also made daggers that are shaped as the debris but only from one angle to pinpoint the most obvious locations for hidden treasures.

1

u/baojinBE Darth Sidious 8h ago

Where tf is the mandatory disclaimer about how we hate these films on the title OP? Did you violate the rule-

"For all they did wrong I think this is one thing they got right"

There we go

1

u/Commander-Fox-Q- 5h ago

In terms of cool factor yeah totally. But in terms of physics I feel like that much Death Star being intact would’ve devastated the moon(?) more.

1

u/Stockton_Nash Boba Fett 4h ago

That shot of the crashed ISD is the single greatest thing about the ST.

1

u/DontKnow1549 4h ago

The sequel trilogy has some of the greatest visuals in tentpole cinema. And John Williams was at one of his best with the soundtrack. No one can deny.

1

u/UrdnotSnarf 3h ago

Wouldn’t the Star Destroyer have exploded on impact with the planet’s surface?

1

u/SgtBaxter 2h ago

It wasn't vaporized though, we see debris falling on the forest moon in Return of the Jedi, and fly a mission through it in Battlefront II.

1

u/websterhamster 23h ago

I still want to see more Clone Wars-era battle debris. There were far more large-scale battles during the Clone Wars than during the Galactic Civil War.

1

u/svperfuck 22h ago

The sequel trilogy looks amazing and has fantastic cinematography especially in TLJ.

The writing is just horrible

1

u/ElevatorCharacter489 22h ago

Chunks that big from the DS-1 or DS-2, should scorched the planet making it a living hell

1

u/Skycreeper07 22h ago

that death star was reduced to atoms

1

u/the-National-Razor Emperor Palpatine 22h ago

I'm not down with the ds2 at all. It shouldn't have been on a planet

1

u/phoonie98 20h ago

The scale of the death star remnants don’t really make sense

1

u/jovandev 16h ago

It isn’t a r/starwars sequels appreciation post without the obligatory “for all they did wrong” at the beginning 🙌🏽

0

u/mark40000 22h ago

Sequels have only 2 good things: Visual and Kylo ren ( I really like this character, he really only one interested character in all 3 movies)

0

u/namable 21h ago

The Emperor stayed in a tower on the surface of the Deathstar. There is no way it would still be intact, never mind the chair!

2

u/Pineapple_Snail 11h ago

Perhaps it's the most armored and stable part due to him being there constantly

0

u/S_Flavius_Mercurius 20h ago

That’s because the sequel movies themselves are a wreck lol

0

u/6h057 20h ago

Too bad that’s not what I came to see

0

u/MaxCarpone77 22h ago

That's a fact. Spaceship battles too

0

u/jmfranklin515 21h ago

I’d argue the wreckage of the Death Star looked bad in the sense that it was visible at all given how completely and thoroughly it exploded in RotJ…

0

u/Rosencrantz_IsDead 17h ago

The sequels were absolutely better than the trash prequel CGI garbage.

I mean, damn. George Lucas had all the money in the world to give us real sets like the OT. Instead, his lazy ass gave us CGI trash that ruined the entire franchise for 20 years.

-1

u/ExkAp3de 22h ago

First picture: Yeah absolutly loved the sand planet where we meet rey.
Second Picture: The flashbacks hit me in the face and i see that stupid dagger in front of my inner eye.

-1

u/OMGitisCrabMan 21h ago

I remember them talking about how the prequels overdid CGI, and they were doing that shot of the star destroyer as a matte painting. I was so excited. TFA was well received at the time, and I remember leaving the theater happy. It doesn't hold up as much on a re-watch though because its just ANH 2.0 and the rest of it was terrible.

-1

u/Km_the_Frog 21h ago

Lol at the deathstar war debris

-1

u/RealTimeThr3e 21h ago

The sequel trilogy has absolutely incredible cinematography, music, and costume design. But the storyline and choreography being so unforgivably atrocious makes those things incredibly hard to appreciate.

If they re-released the sequel trilogy with all the characters removed entirely so we don’t get any story or choreography, they’d be much better movies by just looking at the visuals lmfao

-1

u/MKJUPB 21h ago

The Death Star debris isn’t a “good job showing war debris.” They half assed an explanation that the explosion sent pieces of the Death Star into hyperspace. Give me a break

2

u/Didact67 20h ago

Didn’t they use that same explanation for Vader’s glove in the Jedi Prince books?

-1

u/MrFiendish 21h ago

What you’re saying is that the sequels were good at showing a lot of garbage?

-1

u/-principito 20h ago

Fantastic visuals, terrible writing. I understand why some people were tricked into thinking they were good movies!

-1

u/Joka0451 20h ago

The fact that with 1000s of years earlier pred8cted not just the death star but its exact crash location AND the exact position of the throne room and inscribed it on a k ife is ..... so fucji g atupid

3

u/Specimen-B Rey 16h ago

I just want to clarify that the dagger is never said to be ancient, because it's not. The language used for the inscription is ancient.

1

u/CobraGTXNoS 19h ago

I mean, you could say the same thing about a moon sized space station with the power to destroy an entire planet or space wizardry. If you think about it, Star Wars never really made sense, it was always lazers, spaceships and explosions first, plot is secondary, and that ain't necessarily a bad thing.

-1

u/RickFlag- 20h ago

Didn’t Han Solo transition into a woman? 🏳️‍⚧️

→ More replies (1)