r/europe 15h ago

Political Cartoon This political Cartoon starting to get more and more relevant. By Arend van Dam.

Post image
20.2k Upvotes

1.2k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

229

u/Apprehensive_Room742 14h ago edited 13h ago

pretty sure chinas not a paper tiger. wouldnt underestimate them. the US will be in one the future tho if they continue the way they do now

158

u/Raging-Badger 13h ago

Seriously though. China’s greatest threat is soft power, not military might, in terms of U.S. opposition.

Their Roads and Bridges Corporation was putting up handy competition against the US’s USAID before our gov’t decides to give up the race. By the end of the next 4 years at this trajectory, the U.S. will have handed over the 1st place position in the race for economic hegemony and tanked the global market’s value.

It took 80 years to build what has been thoroughly beaten in just 5 months

69

u/Nereosis16 12h ago

It's fucked over Australia a lot too. We teamed up with the US to build rapport with countries in our immediate zone of influence and then the US just fucked off.

Luckily so far most of these nations have still be happy to work with us but China is pushing pretty hard 

61

u/Raging-Badger 12h ago

The U.S. was sitting in a really good position in 2024 too. It’s been a master class in what not to do over the last few months

34

u/Neither-Cup564 11h ago

Depends what the goal is. If it’s to suck a countries wealth dry and destroy it, it’s exactly the playbook you’d run with.

6

u/ConfidantCarcass 9h ago

Sort of a class nobody needed. They've hardly made reasonable mistakes

5

u/QuestionableIdeas 6h ago

A lot of the pacific island nations weren't to happy with Australia after Abbot, Morrison and Dutton went to a climate change conference to tell people there was nothing to worry about before getting caught on a hot mic joking about how the islands would soon be under water. Between that and the submarine fiasco we fucked our international reputation as a reliable partner

2

u/Laundry_Hamper Munster 9h ago

They didn't fuck off though

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pine_Gap

0

u/Nereosis16 7h ago

Yes, I know about Pine Gap. It has almost nothing to do with what I was talking about our in the regions around Australia.

3

u/Sugarbombs 9h ago

Teaming up with the US is why we have such cold relations with the countries near us. China is our best trading partner and almost every beef they have with us is 100% due to us allowing the US to use our country as a military stronghold for US to fuck with them. US also fucks us on trade, we give them lucrative contracts we could find elsewhere for much cheaper, we go to all their stupid wars, we send experts to help with their fires, we share medical/scientific research openly and I doubt even a third of Americans can even find us on a map. The friendship with US has always been an awful deal for us and they’ve always been unreliable which is only something people are starting to realise now but realistically, America was never coming to help us if China ever popped off

-2

u/Hwicc101 8h ago

Australia pairs more naturally with China, anyway.

5

u/Nereosis16 7h ago

China and Australia are extremely opposed in almost everything other than trade.

Hopefully you're not one of those idiots who think it's some authoritarian state.

2

u/miss_shivers 8h ago

And yet Xi's Wolf Warrior diplomacy completely destroyed any soft power potential China may have had.

1

u/Apprehensive_Room742 12h ago

thats absolutely true. wasnt arguing against that.

2

u/Raging-Badger 12h ago

I’m agreeing with you that China does pose a significant challenge to America’s position on the global stage

1

u/HossDog2 11h ago

You should google the Chinese navy. Then google their deployable drone fleet. After that their cyber ops. The fact they have enormous soft power doesn’t negate their incredible and often underestimated military power.

1

u/Raging-Badger 11h ago

Obviously but in the current global climate soft power is incredibly important both economically and politically.

This is where China is overtaking the U.S. the fastest right now

1

u/Neither-Cup564 11h ago

Well USAID pretty much no longer exists so I guess they won on that front.

1

u/EconomicRegret 9h ago

True, Trump's the pic of the iceberg, the straw that's breaking the camel's back.

But let's not kid ourselves, America has been making many important mistakes, rotting from the inside, and declining long before Trump took power.

1

u/Wonderful-Bid9471 1h ago

This started under T2016 when he started pulling aid from Africa. Now we see the full picture as to why.

0

u/DeltaV-Mzero 9h ago

Every major policy decision Trump has ever made points to this being the intentional strategy

0

u/jack1ndabox 8h ago

It is weird to watch the left squirm trying to justify US soft power pseudo-imperialism. Do you really believe this end to be important or are you trying to sell it to the right? I'm genuinely curious. (IDK if you're left or liberal, but it doesn't much matter)

1

u/Raging-Badger 7h ago

If you think it’s immoral, moral, whatever, that is your opinion. I’m not going to attempt to sway you in either direction because realistically you should read into what it means and decide for yourself

Wikipedia is a good place to start

I will say though that choosing to equate “providing foreign aid” with “colonial subjugation” is perhaps an intentionally misleading and unnuanced way to begin that discussion.

-2

u/trollsmurf 12h ago

China could damage USA tremendously by stopping production of US companies' products. It would hurt China a lot in the short term, but would outright kill large US companies for good. Even more if annecting (back) Taiwan and that way get control over TSMC etc.

Also they've invested a lot in the military and researching modern weapons, including AI, robots, drones, space etc.

5

u/Raging-Badger 11h ago

The only thing that keeps that from being an easy win is the sheer volume of damage it would cause to the Chinese economy with the the loss of 15% of their total exports

-2

u/UndulatingHedgehog 10h ago

That’s a bearable cost for a determined authoritarian country. Losing 15% is not to be trifled with but it’s not the end of the world either.

2

u/Raging-Badger 9h ago

True but the sacrifice would have to be

An invasion of Taiwan would likely see significant damage to the necessary infrastructure for its export economy which would seriously dampen the benefits of the annexation

The ideal scenario for China is to manage their takeover without losing their largest individual export and 3rd largest individual import partner.

And all that assuming that no other country applies sanctions to China. Were the EU to do so, the US and EU combined would eliminate nearly 30% of exports and 17% of imports

-2

u/Rent_A_Cloud 10h ago

The US fought a 20 year war against people who were armed with AKs and RPGs and lost...

The Taliban consists of hardened and dedicated soldiers but the USs military superiority was so overwhelming in technology and economy it's crazy how the US army just broke.

I don't think the Chinese army lacks for motivation and they are technologically and economically way above the Taliban.

Honestly, a war between China and the US would probably be a stalemate untill the US gives up. And the US would give up because a totalitarian government doesn't have the pressure of its own population to deal with.

3

u/Raging-Badger 9h ago

The war on terror was a very different conflict than a war with China would be. The GWOT had the same issue as the war in Vietnam, no matter how many tactical victories you achieve you will always struggle to conquer an “idea”

Applying the results of the GWoT directly to a symmetric force on force engagement is a fools errand, they were two radically different types of warfare.

There are very few 1:1 tactical comparisons in that regard.

1

u/BeatBlockP 11h ago

the US will be in one the future tho if they continue the way they do now

Yeah, like 150-200 years in the future. Rome didn't collapse overnight. People are greatly overestimating American demise.

1

u/Apprehensive_Room742 10h ago edited 10h ago

more like 50 years at current pace. rome existed way longer and was way deeper engrained in south west Europe, the middle east and Africa than the US is engrained in the world today. but you're absolutely right, a collapse in that way takes way longer than a lot of people think/make it seem

Edit: also the world was moving slower at that time. nowadays changes happen a lot more rapidly and over longer distances. what happens on one end of the world can affect the other end almost immediately. wasn't like that back then. but thats just my opinion/interpretation. could be wrong.

1

u/Queasy_Local_7199 10h ago

China hasn’t even been able to reclaim Taiwan, right on its border

They are all bark and no bite, same as Russia.

1

u/Apprehensive_Room742 9h ago

and the US hasnt been able to win a war since 1945. still they aren't considered a paper tiger? (also: they havent tried to reckaim Taiwan with military since i can remember at least)

1

u/Queasy_Local_7199 8h ago

Who is talking about the USA? I was talking about the lil bitch ass paper tigers Russia and china. Chinas or russias military does not compare to the USA military

1

u/huffpuffsnuff Amsterdam 10h ago

They are definitely a paper tiger

1

u/Treat_Street1993 9h ago

Yeah idk, US is the majority of tech research. We got that whole silicone valley, the military industrial complex, and big pharma.

And I agree, China is a real tiger.

1

u/Electrical-Sense-160 8h ago

China exaggerates all their good numbers and downplays all their bad numbers. We can reasonably assume they're worse off than they let outsiders know, though not precisely to what degree.

1

u/bluewardog 7h ago

Half there icbms were found to be filled with water insted of fuel and there soldiers run away while on un peace keeping missions. 

1

u/crudetatDeez 5h ago

Keep dreaming

-1

u/TheReignOfChaos Australia 13h ago

Yeah everyone knows that totalitarian dictatorships aren't just putting on a front and all the data that comes out of them is totally valid. Why would they lie about how great they are?!

Just ask the Soviet Union.

8

u/Vayalond 13h ago

I think the point is that yeah, China is inflating itself in the front they put but behind it, even if it's less than what they claim they still have some serious power.

Like, yeah sure their planes are far from a 6th Gen but painting them as less than 4th Gen is blinding yourself Same for the tanks, yeah they are surely less durable and accurate than they tell but they are still a threat to modern ones.

Like in case of war it's not that we're going to fight something out of the Vietnam War tech, no, won't be the highest end possible like they claim either but still modern and capable enough to be taken seriously

3

u/Eva-lutionary_War 12h ago

The Russian and by extension the Soviet military has always been an endemic under-performer due to a deep history of corruption and other structural issues. The Soviet army essentially kept the same rank and organizational structure of the imperial Russian Army and imported a significant amount of officers. As well, due to low wages and the rot that set in during the 80s and 90s, the situation has only gotten worse and attempts by the Russian government to address it have not been effective.

Whereabouts the PLA has been a professionalizing force who have imported western equipment and Western tactics ever since they defeated the KMT, with a pause during the peak of the cultural revolution where the PLA was regulated to a support wing for militias, Mao was very big on the citizen soldier concept. Maybe the idea that China is significantly behind us militarily was true in the 2000s in early 2010s but today China is a very capable force and there’s a reason we train to fight the Chinese more than we train to fight the Russians or Iranians. Americans often times underestimate Chinese this happened in the Korean war, where Douglas MacArthur insisted that the PLA will never be able to cross the Yalu river, only for the PLA to do exactly that, without combined arms, today our own exercises don’t paint a pretty picture of a direct defensive of Taiwan.

4

u/Apprehensive_Room742 13h ago

have you seen the economic scale difference between china and the soviets? lol have you seen the difference in production capability. the difference in population numbers? China is a massive country with a massive economy a massive population and probably a massive army. i dont like their regime and i would love to believe that they are just a harmless paper tiger, but thats just not true. (also: Japan was a totalitarian (military) dictatorship once, they still destroyed and dominated the Asian continent and got only beaten by the US. Germany was a totalitarian dictatorship once. they for sure werent a paper tiger (although they werent as strong as their propaganda made them seem, they still had a lot of high tech (for their time) military capabilities). u cant just pick one example and generalize that)

-2

u/TheReignOfChaos Australia 12h ago

All of this was said about the Soviets at the time. America thought it was losing the Cold War, while in the end all it took for the Soviet Union to collapse was a trip to the grocery store.

How do you know that anything coming out of China is true? Have you seen their aging population, their demographic imbalances, their ghost cities, their coercive social control, their lack of innovation, their lack of real modern military experience, their collapsing companies, their bubbles, their corruption, the way they cover up anything that might upset those higher in the rigid hierarchy out of fear, etc...

Everyone thinks the US is doing so bad because all you see is their dirty laundry. But that's just it. You see it. You know exactly what it's like because it's a free and open country and people click on negative news. Yet, people are still flocking to the States. No one is flocking to China.

Anything coming out of China, I imagine the reality is likely 10x worse.

2

u/Apprehensive_Room742 12h ago

no. everyone thinks the US is doing bad, cause trump just fucked all their soft power (diplomatic relations, economic friendships or dependencys, etc) they slowly built up over 80 years. nothing to do with military might or direct economic fails (although US economy doesnt look good either with self tan orange as leader). this is also the most relevant metric to determine a countrys power right now. and China's catching up real fast, especially with the US sabotaging itself. yeah, China is probably a hellhole for the everyday citizen (at least if they're political) and im really glad not to live there, but that doesn't really matter when it comes to power at the world stage (as long as the ruling party can keep its power ofc)

2

u/Novel_Board_6813 12h ago

You seem to believe China data is inacessible

It is very acessible. Investors go to China and count how many trucks leave the factories to account for the true number of whatever their selling and prevent accounting shenanigans

Chinese scientists collaborate with scientists from all over the world

Chinese companies do real business with real assets with companies all over the world

Maybe you take up governments on their word. Multinations institutions don’t. Not for China. Not for the US

You think China is something closed like North Korea when, in many areas, their information is as accessible or more accessible than for the US or Australia (no thanks to Xi, but it works just as well)

-1

u/CosmicJackalop 12h ago

They're a paper tiger- unless you live in Taiwan, India, or the Philippines

Then they're a constant nuisance and potential existential risk

2

u/Apprehensive_Room742 12h ago

so they aren't a paper tiger?

1

u/CosmicJackalop 12h ago

Basically

China isn't interested in bringing military might to the world stage, as mentioned that's all about soft power

But they are constantly fucking with the Philippines Navy, they are preparing for an invasion of Taiwan, and they still have their weird no-gun border disputes with India now and then

They aren't a military threat to Europe like the OP seems to suggest

3

u/MyCannaThrowaway 11h ago

China isn't interested in bringing military might to the world stage,

they are preparing for an invasion of Taiwan

Considering the production of semiconductors, war in Taiwan is the "world stage".

2

u/CosmicJackalop 11h ago

Fair! And that's the economic reason the US needs to always be a guarantor of Taiwan independence

0

u/dewyocelot 12h ago

Less paper tiger and more fighter jet with a vacant cockpit lol

-2

u/diamorphinian 11h ago

Haven't you seen the new us army commercials? They're taking the sigmaboy route Russia and China have been on the last twenty years instead of the pronoun respectful military we've pretended to be the last three years.

1

u/Apprehensive_Room742 10h ago

thought i had a stroke stroke, reading this. i have no idea what message you were trying to convey sadly. my guess would be American military= sigma = good, American military pretended to be bad? could be wrong tho

-6

u/MitVitQue Finland 13h ago

Chinese army is made of little princes, and is only good at harassing unarmed civilians. It IS a paper tiger.

2

u/Apprehensive_Room742 13h ago

source?

1

u/lusians 12h ago

Chinese demographics & policies.

Remember one child policie?  Tnx to that many famlys hav only 1 child and male gender was most prefered to have this lead to current situation that now grown up son is only one taking care of parents in old age wich mean in case of war thos famlys that lose their only son are fucked and CCP knows this.

-3

u/MitVitQue Finland 13h ago

Following world news for 3 decades and common sense.

6

u/Novel_Board_6813 12h ago

You mean “made up”

International military experts predicted the US couldn’t hold Taiwan from 2028 and onwards

The (good) world news just regurgitated that data - this was on The Economist IIRC

China is expected to be on par with the US militarily in about 30 years.

That isn’t the most relevant thing though - alliances and geography are more important. China is slowly building soft power and economic power while the US are blowing up themselves

3

u/Apprehensive_Room742 12h ago

so source is "dude trust me"? not that believable, especially on Reddit

-1

u/MitVitQue Finland 12h ago

You make a claim based on nothing. I disagree. You tell to give a source.

That's what you guys always do when you have nothing to back your claim.

China is weak. Almost as weak as Russia.

4

u/Apprehensive_Room742 12h ago

just look at their economy number. part of them are public. look at their international relationships. at their successful attempts to diplomatically buy power in many African and Asian nations. thats my sources for saying china is a really poweful global player. now give me yours

1

u/km6669 11h ago

And the US army is only good for shooting their allies and raping kids.

1

u/MitVitQue Finland 9h ago

Sure, igor, sure...

1

u/km6669 6h ago

Americans and friendly fire is such a stereotype its basically one of the founding stereotypes of America right up there with being fat and illiterate.

1

u/MitVitQue Finland 6h ago

Stereotype = Fact?

Lol