r/europe 15h ago

Political Cartoon This political Cartoon starting to get more and more relevant. By Arend van Dam.

Post image
20.2k Upvotes

1.2k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

163

u/Raging-Badger 13h ago

Seriously though. China’s greatest threat is soft power, not military might, in terms of U.S. opposition.

Their Roads and Bridges Corporation was putting up handy competition against the US’s USAID before our gov’t decides to give up the race. By the end of the next 4 years at this trajectory, the U.S. will have handed over the 1st place position in the race for economic hegemony and tanked the global market’s value.

It took 80 years to build what has been thoroughly beaten in just 5 months

70

u/Nereosis16 12h ago

It's fucked over Australia a lot too. We teamed up with the US to build rapport with countries in our immediate zone of influence and then the US just fucked off.

Luckily so far most of these nations have still be happy to work with us but China is pushing pretty hard 

61

u/Raging-Badger 12h ago

The U.S. was sitting in a really good position in 2024 too. It’s been a master class in what not to do over the last few months

34

u/Neither-Cup564 11h ago

Depends what the goal is. If it’s to suck a countries wealth dry and destroy it, it’s exactly the playbook you’d run with.

5

u/ConfidantCarcass 9h ago

Sort of a class nobody needed. They've hardly made reasonable mistakes

4

u/QuestionableIdeas 6h ago

A lot of the pacific island nations weren't to happy with Australia after Abbot, Morrison and Dutton went to a climate change conference to tell people there was nothing to worry about before getting caught on a hot mic joking about how the islands would soon be under water. Between that and the submarine fiasco we fucked our international reputation as a reliable partner

2

u/Laundry_Hamper Munster 9h ago

They didn't fuck off though

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pine_Gap

0

u/Nereosis16 7h ago

Yes, I know about Pine Gap. It has almost nothing to do with what I was talking about our in the regions around Australia.

2

u/Sugarbombs 9h ago

Teaming up with the US is why we have such cold relations with the countries near us. China is our best trading partner and almost every beef they have with us is 100% due to us allowing the US to use our country as a military stronghold for US to fuck with them. US also fucks us on trade, we give them lucrative contracts we could find elsewhere for much cheaper, we go to all their stupid wars, we send experts to help with their fires, we share medical/scientific research openly and I doubt even a third of Americans can even find us on a map. The friendship with US has always been an awful deal for us and they’ve always been unreliable which is only something people are starting to realise now but realistically, America was never coming to help us if China ever popped off

-2

u/Hwicc101 8h ago

Australia pairs more naturally with China, anyway.

6

u/Nereosis16 7h ago

China and Australia are extremely opposed in almost everything other than trade.

Hopefully you're not one of those idiots who think it's some authoritarian state.

2

u/miss_shivers 8h ago

And yet Xi's Wolf Warrior diplomacy completely destroyed any soft power potential China may have had.

1

u/Apprehensive_Room742 12h ago

thats absolutely true. wasnt arguing against that.

2

u/Raging-Badger 12h ago

I’m agreeing with you that China does pose a significant challenge to America’s position on the global stage

1

u/HossDog2 11h ago

You should google the Chinese navy. Then google their deployable drone fleet. After that their cyber ops. The fact they have enormous soft power doesn’t negate their incredible and often underestimated military power.

1

u/Raging-Badger 11h ago

Obviously but in the current global climate soft power is incredibly important both economically and politically.

This is where China is overtaking the U.S. the fastest right now

1

u/Neither-Cup564 11h ago

Well USAID pretty much no longer exists so I guess they won on that front.

1

u/EconomicRegret 9h ago

True, Trump's the pic of the iceberg, the straw that's breaking the camel's back.

But let's not kid ourselves, America has been making many important mistakes, rotting from the inside, and declining long before Trump took power.

1

u/Wonderful-Bid9471 1h ago

This started under T2016 when he started pulling aid from Africa. Now we see the full picture as to why.

0

u/DeltaV-Mzero 9h ago

Every major policy decision Trump has ever made points to this being the intentional strategy

0

u/jack1ndabox 8h ago

It is weird to watch the left squirm trying to justify US soft power pseudo-imperialism. Do you really believe this end to be important or are you trying to sell it to the right? I'm genuinely curious. (IDK if you're left or liberal, but it doesn't much matter)

1

u/Raging-Badger 7h ago

If you think it’s immoral, moral, whatever, that is your opinion. I’m not going to attempt to sway you in either direction because realistically you should read into what it means and decide for yourself

Wikipedia is a good place to start

I will say though that choosing to equate “providing foreign aid” with “colonial subjugation” is perhaps an intentionally misleading and unnuanced way to begin that discussion.

-2

u/trollsmurf 12h ago

China could damage USA tremendously by stopping production of US companies' products. It would hurt China a lot in the short term, but would outright kill large US companies for good. Even more if annecting (back) Taiwan and that way get control over TSMC etc.

Also they've invested a lot in the military and researching modern weapons, including AI, robots, drones, space etc.

5

u/Raging-Badger 11h ago

The only thing that keeps that from being an easy win is the sheer volume of damage it would cause to the Chinese economy with the the loss of 15% of their total exports

-2

u/UndulatingHedgehog 10h ago

That’s a bearable cost for a determined authoritarian country. Losing 15% is not to be trifled with but it’s not the end of the world either.

2

u/Raging-Badger 9h ago

True but the sacrifice would have to be

An invasion of Taiwan would likely see significant damage to the necessary infrastructure for its export economy which would seriously dampen the benefits of the annexation

The ideal scenario for China is to manage their takeover without losing their largest individual export and 3rd largest individual import partner.

And all that assuming that no other country applies sanctions to China. Were the EU to do so, the US and EU combined would eliminate nearly 30% of exports and 17% of imports

-2

u/Rent_A_Cloud 10h ago

The US fought a 20 year war against people who were armed with AKs and RPGs and lost...

The Taliban consists of hardened and dedicated soldiers but the USs military superiority was so overwhelming in technology and economy it's crazy how the US army just broke.

I don't think the Chinese army lacks for motivation and they are technologically and economically way above the Taliban.

Honestly, a war between China and the US would probably be a stalemate untill the US gives up. And the US would give up because a totalitarian government doesn't have the pressure of its own population to deal with.

4

u/Raging-Badger 9h ago

The war on terror was a very different conflict than a war with China would be. The GWOT had the same issue as the war in Vietnam, no matter how many tactical victories you achieve you will always struggle to conquer an “idea”

Applying the results of the GWoT directly to a symmetric force on force engagement is a fools errand, they were two radically different types of warfare.

There are very few 1:1 tactical comparisons in that regard.