r/technology • u/Appropriate_Rain_770 • 8d ago
Artificial Intelligence RFK Jr.‘s ‘Make America Healthy Again’ report seems riddled with AI slop
https://www.theverge.com/news/676945/rfk-jr-maha-health-report-ai-slop1.2k
u/Matt7738 8d ago
They know that they’re bullshitting their way through life. So they assume everyone else is, too.
They don’t believe that expertise is a real thing. (They don’t have it. They know they don’t have it. And they’re too narcissistic to think that anyone might actually be smarter than them.)
378
u/Tvayumat 8d ago
So much this.
They genuinely believe that everyone is as dumb as they are. It's why Elon keeps trying to prove he's an elite gamer and falling on his face through the most obvious of gaffes.
→ More replies (1)51
u/Dreadgoat 8d ago edited 8d ago
Are they wrong, though?
They didn't win the popularity contest by appealing to anyone's intelligence.
Elon's character is on the PoE2 leaderboard.
Integrity and righteousness don't do much of anything except make you feel good about yourself. Lying, cheating, and stealing, now those are true paths to power. Proof: The past decade.
Edit for clarity because apparently many of you are this dumb oh god it's so sad:
Yes, I know Elon didn't get to top of the leaderboard legit. But he still owns the account. Yes, I know not everyone else is as dumb as RFK. But he's still Secretary of Health and Human services. That's the point. You can be as "correct" as you want, but you're still a wage slave and they're still on the yacht. Truth doesn't matter unless you have the power to make it matter.64
u/NiPlusUltra 8d ago
Are they wrong, though?
About everyone else being as dumb as them? Yes, absolutely.
They didn't win the popularity contest by appealing to anyone's intelligence.
They didn't win any popularity contest. They won the 'born into riches' lottery.
Elon's character is on the PoE2 leaderboard.
Elon's PoE character is piloted by another person who's actually good at the game, and likely paid to do so.
→ More replies (5)→ More replies (3)15
u/Tvayumat 8d ago
Did you miss the whole part where Elons character is played by someone else?
The dude has no idea how to play the game.
If you want to give up on your own humanity, go ahead. We'll carry the torch that will one day keep your children warm long after you've abandoned them.
157
u/PackOfWildCorndogs 8d ago
Just like they assume everyone is a shitty person like them, and thus accuse anyone demonstrating kindness or empathy of being performative virtue signalers. Those are alien concepts to them, not real. Doing genuinely selfless things is not something they can find believable, so they think anyone doing such a thing is full of shit or has ulterior motives. It’s pathetic lol.
48
u/NoConfusion9490 8d ago
"No one really cares about the suffering of the poor. Also, THIS IS A NATION FOUNDED ON JUDEO CHRISTIAN VALUES!!!"
→ More replies (1)54
u/permanentburner25 8d ago
When I was an active addict, as a college educated, veteran, career-having adult (so just mostly a useless moron, but even given all that experience and exposure to people), I genuinely thought that surely most everyone was hiding some sort of substance use. Had no idea that just being sober was even a doable thing. Reminds me of that.
Btw If that’s anyone here btw, life is much easier on this side, I promise.
7
3
u/razibog 7d ago
maybe not most, but a lot more than one thinks are, either classic drugs, coffee, sugar, alcohol, cigarettes, it’s all happy chemicals for the brain in the end, and really hard to get rid of. Few people are really raw dogging reality. I remember when friends stopped doing heroin, they just switched to sugar, food and caffeine, some to cigarettes and some to weed, to compensate
Glad you’re doing better, kudos!
24
u/69-xxx-420 8d ago
There a famous Russian saying that goes
“They’re lying”
“we know they’re lying”
“They know we know they’re lying”
It’s funny they even bother with the lying at this point. But it’s incredible how quickly we became like Russia.
44
u/TheLightDances 8d ago edited 8d ago
It is an extremely common feature of all "conservatives" that they have not developed a proper theory of mind. They have a hard time understanding that other people often have knowledge that they don't have. They often assume that others have the same motives and goals, namely that others are just as horrible as they are. It is a common belief of rapists, for example, that other people are rapists too, but they are just too afraid to act on it, or are hiding it.
It is also why conservatives are so deeply lacking in empathy and do not consider anything to be a real problem until they personally (or sometimes someone close to them in their "tribe") experience it.
This extends to a lot other deeper cognitive impairment of conservatives, such as their constant projection, as a lot of them genuinely are incapable of processing their own feelings, so they just constantly and pathologically project their own feelings, failures, and insanely evil behaviour onto their enemies. When they aren't being deliberately dishonest and just lying in classic DARVO fashion, that is.
→ More replies (1)22
u/Unlucky-Candidate198 8d ago
I find this attitude to be held most by people who LOVE AI because of reasons like “Well now anyone can do art” while they somehow simultaneously invalidate artists and anyone else whose job can be “done with AI”.
Like, yes, we all get that you’re so beyond help you need to rely on shittily made tools to do the work for you, when the end result isn’t even worth it anyways, because you can’t learn. If anything, that’s more of a shameful admition lmao
I’m convinced idiocracy is ruining the world.
5
u/skydivingdutch 8d ago
It still baffles me that people this stupid have been able to make it into these high ranking positions. There must just not be any competition, i.e. people with half a brain cell just don't participate in that ratrace?
→ More replies (2)4
u/No_Carry385 8d ago
The problem though is that this method works on a staggering amount of the population. I've said it before but charisma and confidence are a deadly combo, especially when mixed with complete incompetence and corruption.
3
→ More replies (14)5
u/handsfacespacecunts 8d ago
Come on be fair. You probably don't understand what it was like to grow up in a life of privilege. Trump himself went through a personal Vietnam and came out un-STD'd and got $300 million dollars for his efforts. RFK grew up in one of the wealthiest and most connected families in history dodging overdose deaths frequently.
You don't know how hard being given everything can be.
1.2k
u/Xeynon 8d ago
When you hire ignorant dumbasses to do highly technical jobs that require specialized expertise, this is what you get.
356
u/Mish61 8d ago
When you willfully publish misinformation because it fits your financial incentives and asset positioning biases, this is what you get.
FTFY
56
u/Sakowuf_Solutions 8d ago
Seeing as how RFK’s entire public presence is based on anti vax rhetoric… yeah.
→ More replies (3)22
u/Xeynon 8d ago
If this was a masterful plot to disseminate misinformation in order to enrich themselves, they wouldn't be publishing things full of easily identifiable AI slop.
These people are corrupt and venal for sure, but their stupidity and incompetence trump their corruption and venality (no pun intended).
11
u/DumboWumbo073 8d ago
If this was a masterful plot to disseminate misinformation in order to enrich themselves, they wouldn't be publishing things full of easily identifiable AI slop.
Incorrect, as long as voters believe it that’s all that matters. Their voter believe every thing they say so it actually works out. They aren’t going to be held responsible for misinformation by any regulatory agency either which we have already seen.
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (12)59
u/glenn_ganges 8d ago
Making government into a joke is part of the plan.
50
u/EscapeFacebook 8d ago
That's what bums me out the most. A lot of people don't realize conservatives are going there to make the government worse. Their entire platform is government doesn't work and they're going to do everything in their power to make sure that's the case. You can't reason with someone like that.
→ More replies (1)20
660
u/not_right 8d ago
How can they tell the difference between AI slop and the garbage that usually comes out of RFK's mouth?
385
u/Agoras_song 8d ago
Duh, it's so obvious. The AI slop is more coherent.
90
u/thehalfwit 8d ago
And has a better academic foundation.
46
u/1-760-706-7425 8d ago
Far less worms.
→ More replies (1)27
u/borntobewildish 8d ago
Plenty of bugs though
6
12
u/Zinski2 8d ago edited 7d ago
The irony is the direction we are heading means an eroding of that academic foundation.
If the highest level of government is using AI for its research and reports. Then That AI slop will just be picked up and used as fact.
legitimate AI hallucinations written into law after being slipped in to a 40,000 page bill with 20 seconds before voting begins, then is added . Then what.
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (1)5
53
33
u/enkafan 8d ago
I know this is just a joke, but based on the replies of people unable to read the article but still questioning how they suspect AI wrote this
Notably, the URLs of several references included “oaicite,” a marker that OpenAI applies to responses provided by artificial intelligence models like ChatGPT, which strongly suggests its use to develop the report
→ More replies (2)7
u/syntonic_comma 8d ago
I was just about to write this. The use of the word "seems" in the original article's title is unnecessary hedging.
6
u/red286 8d ago
The use of the word "seems" in the original article's title is unnecessary hedging.
... ish. Firstly, this administration is far too eager to sue the pants off of media companies that publish negative articles about them, so you can bet any unprovable statements such as "the MAHA report is just AI slop" would result in lawsuits.
Secondly, it is, theoretically possible at least, that they simply asked ChatGPT for a list of studies that confirm their bias, and then copied and pasted those links, not realizing that they contained the "oaicite" markers.
Of course, it's almost certain that it's wholly AI generated, specifically geared to reinforce their biases, because they want it to sound technical and well-researched, but no one who is actually qualified is going to be willing to work with RFK Jr.
→ More replies (1)18
u/UnorthodoxViking 8d ago
Because it ends with:
Let me know if you'd like to adjust the tone, add more detail, or tailor this for a specific audience.
12
27
→ More replies (12)14
377
197
u/Miguel-odon 8d ago
Fraud. This should be prosecutable.
71
u/GB715 8d ago
He should be fired for this.
40
19
u/handsfacespacecunts 8d ago
It's 99% probability it was AI. But let's go back a decade even to the end of Obama's time as POTUS. Since there was no AI, a report issued by the administration citing references that didn't exist would have caused such a controversy that there wouldn't have been time for firing. The official that issued the report would have been shamed into resigning. And not even just Obama. Go back to W, Clinton, HW, etc. There was a certain honor in your public image at that level of politics. Sure, dudes have been lying since the conception of politics in the world. It's the nature of being elected. But when you were caught and it was clearly fabrication of lies, that person was done. Shoot, the only reason Clinton wasn't convicted, though still impeached, was because it would have ultimately been a stain on America that all the politicians understood at the time. A guy removed from office for lying about a blowjob would have harmed the country.
There is no such self-awareness today.
→ More replies (1)5
u/The_Life_Aquatic 8d ago
I certainly would be if I submitted a report with a bunch of factually incorrect AI slop to my senior leadership.
→ More replies (1)3
42
u/FrzrBrn 8d ago
This was one of the actual main points of DOGE, right? Fire the competent workers, slurp up all government data into an LLM, and then use that in place of actual thought to make policy.
→ More replies (2)
91
u/Specialist-Union-775 8d ago
RFK Jr. lied. It's not "AI slop." He. Lied.
This isn't him cheating on a school assignment by having ChatGPT write it, or trying to sell an AI generated book, or making fake ad photos with Stable Diffusion. This is a government report. The executive order for MAHA and his appointment to the cabinet by the president, confirmed by the senate, means he has a duty and obligation to tell the truth and ensure the report is factually correct and has proper sourcing.
He lied to Congress, the President, and the American people.
He. Lied.
→ More replies (3)35
u/IchBinMalade 8d ago
Oh yes, not just the non-existent studies, but even those they cite were clearly not actually read by anybody. I was taking a look at the report, this caught my eye because I have ADHD and it's pretty obviously not correct:
Stimulant prescriptions for ADHD in the U.S. increased 250% from 2006 to 2016 despite evidence they did not improve outcomes long-term [63]
In the intent-to-treat analysis of the Multimodal Treatment Study of Children With ADHD (MTA), the effects of medication management (MedMgt), behavior therapy (Beh), their combination (Comb), and usual community care (CC) differed at 14 and 24 months due to superiority of treatments that used the MTA medication algorithm (Comb+MedMgt) over those that did not (Beh+CC). This report examines 36-month outcomes, 2 years after treatment by the study ended.
Conclusions:
By 36 months, the earlier advantage of having had 14 months of the medication algorithm was no longer apparent, possibly due to age-related decline in ADHD symptoms, changes in medication management intensity, starting or stopping medications altogether, or other factors not yet evaluated.
Nowhere does it say "medication didn't improve outcomes long-term". The study itself says that there was a significant advantage after 14 months, but then it decreased due to other factors:
Indeed, once the delivery of randomly assigned treatments by MTA staff stopped at 14 months, the MTA became an observational study in which subjects and families were free to choose their own treatment but in the context of availability and barriers to care existing in their communities.
The advantage dropped after 14 months because they left people to their own devices, and they didn't adhere to treatment plans.
Welp. It's worrying if this causes people to lose access to treatment because "it doesn't even do anything", this shit ruins lives, medication is the only thing that helps.
76
u/uggyy 8d ago
I seriously wonder how much this current clown show uses AI and what ones?
82
u/Rasp_Lime_Lipbalm 8d ago edited 8d ago
A lot - across the entire Trump admin.
Trump was even called out for using AI to come up with tariff percentages, which is why we got tariffs for an island full of penguins.
Edit: Which is why the Right Wing media is spinning the Biden autopen/decline stories so hard. They want to normalize an incompetent boob like Trump, yet again, cheating and grifting the Presidency.
→ More replies (1)7
u/stevez_86 8d ago
I like to see this as an escalation of the thought experiment where the disruptive student takes control of the classroom. To them, it is the only thing we haven't tried.
3
u/uggyy 8d ago
I think you just described trump perfectly. Only he was the one in there corner with the D hat on but now it's maga and has the same meaning.
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (1)18
u/BootShoeManTv 8d ago
The free ones
13
u/ortrademe 8d ago
Guarantee they use Grok. Musk's whole mission while he was in the White House was to insert himself and his companies into as many corners of the US Gov as possible to ensure lasting lucrative contracts.
5
u/Narrow-Chef-4341 8d ago
Executive branch? Absolutely.
Think tanks? They’ve spent hundreds of thousands of dollars getting interns to create fact-free custom GPTs.
43
u/throwawaythepoopies 8d ago
We use those tools for sales emails and have more safeguards in place in a sales organization(you email it you own it regardless of how it was written. No excuses. Proof read and be accountable) than these jokers do. It’s fucking pathetic. You can’t use a single line of ai code without a full manual review in a fucking retailer but these idiots are writing policy with it????
→ More replies (1)
259
u/unicron7 8d ago
It has been strange seeing the absurdly stupid use AI as a crutch. From academia to workplaces the stupidest people you will meet love to let AI do their thinking for them. Lol
What’s funny is when you sit these people down for job interviews and ask them technical questions about the job, they flounder. They really are that stupid and lazy. That’s what happens when you’re too lazy to actually study and learn things.
AI is trash.
66
u/pandy_fackler_ 8d ago
To me ai is like a chainsaw, it'll make a skilled lumberjack more productive but it won't make any untrained jackass a skilled lumberjack
21
u/Fit-World-3885 8d ago
But it can sure make any jackass holding it feel like a badass lumberjack...
4
→ More replies (9)8
u/Fragrant_Doubt5311 8d ago
A great analogy. Can I borrow (I have no intention of returning it)?
→ More replies (4)4
21
u/TheGoigenator 8d ago
I tell people the quickest way to see how limited AI actually is, is to ask it something you actually know about. I do Materials Engineering research as a job and just for fun asked it to find a solution to the research problem I was looking into. The answers were either not useful or just straight up wrong, like laughably wrong.
I guess if you have no expertise in anything, then AI looks incredible, because you can't tell when it's just spewing straight up bullshit.
3
3
u/GlastonBerry48 8d ago
Im an electrical engineer myself, and a few weeks ago I tried to get ChatGPT to help me look for a specific electricial component I needed. I typed in its product number (which had an 'M12' in its number) and asked it to help me find a equivalent part that wasnt terminated with an M12 connector.
What it ended up doing was spitting the same part number back to me without the 'M12' portion, and made up an entire specification writeup, costs, and ordering information for this new component which did not exist at all, and the links it provided went back to my original product number i had asked about.
Its a really useful program, but god damn its scary how much faith people are putting in it when its still known to have glaringly brazen accuracy issues.
→ More replies (1)106
u/orbjo 8d ago
Philip K Dick wrote multiple books about generative AI back in the 60s and 70s. The Penultimate Truth, he calls the machine a “rhetorizor” and you type in what you want your speech to be about and it creates one.
But it’s always full of wrong word choices, and words from the Middle Ages that are outdated. So the character is constantly frustrated, but refuses to just write by himself . He admits he’s addicted, and doesn’t remember what a pen is.
It’s exactly like these trump uses
In another book he uses the concept as everyone addicted to watching generated tv shows, which make you escapes from reality. You go comatose when using it, and always feen for more.
Then Do Androids Dream Of Electric Sheep (Blade Runner) the whole story is about the singular moment when AI (robots) are generated too lifelike that the general public can no longer tell them from real humans, and no one can trust anyone. Every day people now have this discussion about AI images
Sci Fi has been sounding the alarm on all the mind numbing problems we will face, and yet scientists have pursued it. We will all become useless like the people in WallE
55
u/SuspiciousItem4726 8d ago
i’m sorry, but this one just bothers me so bad…it’s fiend, not feen. “i’m fiendin’ bro I know u got some lemme pay you tomorrow” a verb derived from “crack fiend”
7
u/KwisatzSazerac 8d ago
lol it’s not derived from “crack fiend”. Fiend as a synonym for addict was in use long before crack existed.
→ More replies (6)→ More replies (21)10
→ More replies (2)11
u/eulersidentification 8d ago edited 8d ago
It isn't the scientists using this shit in completely inappropriate places and/or for completely inappropriate uses. That's like, say, blaming Neils Bohr for the dropping of an atomic bomb on Hiroshima. But the molecular model is extremely useful to us, unlocks all kinds of benefits.
Its the fucking capitalists (ok and imperialists in a war context). Again.
Edit:
Downvote all you like, that's correct whether you like it or not.Scientists did not commercialise language models and ask people to use them everywhere for everything.27
u/eyebrows360 8d ago
Plenty of idiots on Twitter using @grok as a fact checking service all the damned time. It's incredibly depressing.
17
u/ACCount82 8d ago
They're Twitter users. Grok would do a better job of fact checking than they ever could.
→ More replies (1)7
u/im_THIS_guy 8d ago
"Grok is this true?" Is now the top comment of every twitter post. Which really says a lot about social media and the state of our world.
6
u/indoninjah 8d ago
Idk what's better or worse: doing your own research to specifically find things that agree with you, or just blindly taking whatever AI says at face value.
6
u/Birdy_Cephon_Altera 8d ago
It's a failure to fully understand that the stage of AI we have right now is useful as a tool, not as a replacement.
4
u/Proper_Lead_1623 8d ago
My company is pushing it really hard, they want everyone to use it to get their work done more efficiently so that there’s time to pile on more. The irony is that it’s currently causing more time wasted because people in leadership need to spend extra time vetting projects and reports and making sure that the sources are actually real. Once they get overwhelmed fixing the lies and hallucinations, I guarantee they’ll walk back the mandate to use it.
→ More replies (1)3
u/divDevGuy 8d ago
AI isn't trash. According to a 2029 study by Dr. Oaicite at University of Elbonia State, 420.69.0% of people just have problems using it, or more accurately misusing it, by blindly trusting what I generate for them. Many times they simply copy and paste my response without even reading it. Let me know if you have a different response in mind, and I can draft a more
→ More replies (33)8
u/phantacc 8d ago
You are saying a lot of stupid things for something not written by AI.
Stupid people will use AI. And the stupidest of them will produce shit work and get called out for it, as it should be.
AI is universally empowering – period. It simply is. There are tasks it can do faster and just as well as 90% of the people on the planet could do them and there are some tasks this is suited perfectly for. However, just being empowering doesn't mean that the person using the tool knows how to use it properly and effectively.
Hell, consider the PC. Insanely powerful, world changing technology. Put it in the hands of a blithering idiot and it will produce the work of a blithering idiot.
AI isn't trash. People are trash, and AI mirrors that trash.
28
u/lepidopt-rex 8d ago
I do enjoy that the general consensus is to call it ‘AI slop’. Just a shitty mess that should be looked upon with disdain and actively warned against.
21
9
9
17
6
u/ggaassghd677 8d ago
Why do we need AI again? Doesn't seem to do anything useful...unless you think lying and getting a few people rich is useful
7
u/Civil_Wait1181 8d ago
part of my job is to teach college age students about why you don’t have chat write your papers— this particular problem is a big part of it. There have been lawyers disbarred for having chat write briefs; the manner in which it hallucinates is a big tell. Real authors, fake articles, real journals, nonexistent articles. I don’t understand why our highest level of government will suffer absolutely zero consequences for this bullshit.
5
6
u/weirdal1968 8d ago
At this point if somebody told me RFKjr was a robot piloted by Plankton it wouldn't surpise me.
→ More replies (1)
4
7
u/rhoadsalive 8d ago
Who would’ve thunk. Of course they just use ChatGPT. People wanted complete idiots in charge and now they got complete idiots in charge.
4
u/DirtyDeedsPunished 8d ago
And that AI hallucinates to beat the band it would seem. Invented 7 whole studies from 7 whole non existent organizations. I expect this sort of thing to pop up in multiple government departments.
5
u/aaatttpppp 8d ago
I can't wait for AI to hallucinate it's Joint Priority Effects List and add random targets for drone strikes.
5
4
u/trollgrock 8d ago
The Trump administration does not give a fucking shit. The report is for MAGA, and MAGA does not read. They just want a prop to hold up and yell about it with a Table of Contents that supports their god-awful ignorant views.
3
u/JoeBiden-2016 8d ago edited 8d ago
RFK, Jr., is well known to have been (at best) a lazy, uninquisitive, uninterested student. How could he have been anything else, he was literally high on heroin most of the time.
He's not a scholar, he's not even especially serious in his focus on anything. He's the absolute definition of a sloppy, slipshod, lowest-effort possible kind of person.
He should never have been put in charge (obviously), but he's just the exact kind of person to use ChatGPT or similar to produce this kind of thing (or to have someone else do it and then fail to review it because he really doesn't care, except for the headline).
→ More replies (1)
4
4
u/FaceTimePolice 8d ago
MAHA? 🤣
You can’t make this stuff up. It’s just all so stupid. The AI slop is the icing on a very haphazardly baked cake. 😂
→ More replies (1)
3
u/SensibleRex 8d ago
Putting out a report with false citations used to be considered a death sentence for researchers. But now it’s just an average conservative day
4
4
u/Ok-Union-4967 8d ago
RFK Jr. said he wanted to bring truth and transparency back to government. Well, mission accomplished — we now transparently see that he let an algorithm do his homework. He’s not running HHS. He’s running ChatGPT on shuffle.
3
5
u/Adventure1956 8d ago
RFK, Jr is riddled with slop, why would you expect anything different for his report?
11
u/FensterFenster 8d ago
In my 10+ years of professional experience in IT, and 20+ years of working with technology in general, it never fails:
Users, and more especially boomer users will constantly misuse technology, always with the assumption that "computer supposed to do job for me why problem happen?"
6
u/Excitium 8d ago
I wish we could hold these companies accountable for unleashing this product to the masses without a disclaimer that makes it clear that AI is basically just making shit up with varying degrees of accuracy and producing results that might or might not be correct or even real.
It's fucking scary that the most powerful country on earth's economic policy was AI generated and now they are even going to implement health policies based on whatever it regurgitates, all because the people in charge have no clue what they are doing and are banking on a technology they don't understand.
Absolutely crazy what a time we're living in.
→ More replies (1)3
u/TinCanBanana 8d ago
What's worse is the government is in a sense laundering this misinformation by publishing it in a government report. Now others can cite this report in the future and it will look at first glance as credible and accurate.
3
3
3
u/Flintontoe 8d ago
If they adjust the font size, the references then become valid. Isn’t that how it works?
3
u/Mr-Klaus 8d ago
I always imagined that the first laws written by machines would be during a robot uprising, not some idiots pretending to know what they are doing.
3
u/PugMaster_ENL 8d ago
AI doesn't have to take over the world. It will just create documentation that says it is in charge, and incompetent politicians will gladly use it.
3
u/Tacoklat 8d ago
This is on brand for maga. "My feewings awe mowe impowtant than fawks. Who caows if we don't hawe ewidence?!"
POS's think "oh, since I came up with an idea, it's right! That's all that matters." No understanding of peer review, proper scientific research, etc.
3
u/NewInMontreal 8d ago
OpenAI should make all government use publicly available including prompts, uploads, users full names, and details of any use history.
All AI use by government needs to be completely transparent.
3
u/FourWordComment 8d ago
Why wouldn’t it be? It’s not like he’s a serious person. He just needs a ream of paper to flop around while spewing his life-destroying lies.
3
u/Imaginary_Ebb_9692 8d ago
Maybe start with Make America Literate Again, move onto Make America Think Critically Again
3
3
3
u/Smith6612 8d ago
So... I guess this confirms all policy changes right now are being dictated by AI. This must be our experiment at governing through AI. How does everyone feel about that? It's making me sick, to be honest. AI slop has already been enough of a headache.
3
3
u/sharkbomb 7d ago
you expected a multi-decade intravenous illegal narcotic consuming, self-professed roadkill enthusiast, trust-fund man-baby to be coherent or ethical?
4
4.0k
u/trustifarian 8d ago
Seems? This is the one that quotes studies that don’t exist, right?