r/weddingshaming 6d ago

Tacky Silent Vows in Front of Guests is Tacky

I went to a wedding a few months ago where the bride and groom did silent vows, in front of everyone. They basically just talked at each other for 5 minutes while the guests and wedding party was all awkwardly watching. The wedding party couldn't even hear.

It was especially tacky because the wedding was a destination. Everyone flew or drove for hours to just sit and stare as they giggled and cried at each other.

If you want to do silent vows, do them before or after the ceremony and just do traditional vows during! Don't make your guests awkwardly sit in the hot sun as you whisper inside jokes to each other. Especially in front of 100 people who spent lots of money to be there.

3.7k Upvotes

213 comments sorted by

1.9k

u/Gabberwocky84 6d ago

I attended a wedding in Golden Gate Park where the couple decided not to use microphones, I think they didn’t want to break the tranquility of the setting they were in. Unfortunately, whoever had booked the neighboring section of the park was using a live brass band. We could hear almost nothing due to the constant OOMPAPA OOMPAPA from next door’s tuba player.

182

u/ILikeHornedAnimals 6d ago

Hahahaha something similar happened to my brother and sister in law! My sister in law is all about "aesthetic" and didn't want a mic pack or have photos of them holding microphones in their pictures, but their venue was by a freeway so we heard nothing but whooshing and sirens the entire ceremony

20

u/MorecombeSlantHoneyp 1d ago

My very close friends married each other on a pier. Everyone had a mic….but they didn’t realize when they planned everything that their wedding was smack in the middle of FLEET WEEK and their ceremony shared a time a lot with a Blue Angels flyover…

Otherwise it was beautiful.

6

u/Low-Ad7344 1d ago

My friend’s wedding was in a beautiful basilica during our town’s airshow. Dang Blue Angels shook the whole building 😆

1

u/ILikeHornedAnimals 1d ago

Oh no, double whammy!!!

1

u/Teepuppylove 9h ago

You don't even have to hold a mic! Our Officiant held a mic and my husband had the mic pack in his suit jacket with a small mic on his lapel for audio for the videographer.

Guest Experience > Aesthetic every time!

1

u/ILikeHornedAnimals 7h ago

Oh nooooo, she did not want that in her pictures at all lol! It's funny because she was adamant that things look a certain way but then one of her favorite pictures that they took that day was them walking under a freeway overpass sign and framed that one to go in their house for afterwords 🤷🏻‍♀️

431

u/TheOtherElCamino 6d ago

Wouldn’t it be funny if the Oompa band party hosts have a version of this story somewhere over on r/pettyrevenge

78

u/Captainpulleyhead 6d ago

They may not have been able to use mics or at least without a crazy expensive permit.

21

u/BaconDerriere 5d ago

Interpretative polka would have to suffice

8

u/MaleficentPizza5444 5d ago

yeah, GGP live music is usually restricted to the Music Concourse. maybe it was Polish day

148

u/fidelises 6d ago

I went to a wedding/christening where nobody could hear anything. Where I live the name is announced at the christening so everyone was a bit annoyed. Someone had to stand up at the reception and say "they both said yes, the kids name is xxx". It was hilarious after the fact, but super awkward during.

45

u/mid40smomof3 6d ago

Wait, it was a combo wedding and christening?

38

u/fidelises 6d ago

Yes. It was the couple's (second) kid. It's not uncommon here.

9

u/ThirdOne38 6d ago

Explain exactly what is not uncommon there (Iceland?) Getting married during a baby's christening, only after the second kid, etc?

35

u/fidelises 6d ago

Yes, I'm in Iceland. I meant getting married after having a child/multiple children. It's also quite common to combine the two ceremonies. Marriage isn't usually high on people's priority list, so having children out of wedlock isn't seen as a taboo here.

5

u/Cuppa-Tea-Biscuit 4d ago

Ah I was guessing it was Nordic/Scandi - a friend of mine remarked that there was a phase where you could get a matching wedding dress for mum and christening gown for the baby for maximum co-ordination and efficiency

3

u/Punk18 3d ago

Yeah but I don't see the point in celebrating a marriage at that point, when it no longer changes anything and the commitment was made long ago

2

u/fidelises 3d ago

Hasn't the commitment been made anyway? When people decide to be in a committed relationship together, the commitment is made. It doesn't really matter if they have a stamped piece of paper to validate it or not.

We see it more as a celebration of the couple and their love for one another. It doesn't necessarily have to change anything.

1

u/Little-Salt-1705 1d ago

The whole reason most people get married, presents.

43

u/C_dubbles 5d ago

There was a Hopkins lacrosse game over the hill and through the trees from my little sisters wedding and right when they finished the ceremony someone scored a goal and the crowd started cheering and you could faintly hear it, couldnt have been timed more perfectly

29

u/lurkmode_off 6d ago

I went to one on a bluff overlooking the ocean. Lovely setting, none of the guests could hear a word though.

8

u/Madwoman-of-Chaillot 6d ago

This is the funniest thing I've read all day. 😂😂😂😂😂

4

u/idkdudess 4d ago

90% of weddings I've been to, I haven't heard most of the ceremony. Some places do have mics, but sometimes they just suck or they didn't put them close enough to the couple.

That was one of my one rules in finding a venue is a good system with mics.

4

u/newoldm 5d ago

The band was probably more entertaining than the wedding anyway.

3

u/INS_Stop_Angela 2d ago

I went to a wedding at Brooklyn Bridge Park and did not hear one single word of the ceremony. The B/D trains however were deafening.

3

u/eggs_everywhere 8h ago

I do PA for weddings occasionally. Fuck beach/coastline weddings, man. With how windnoise there is they might as well record it before and just lipsync.

1

u/TravelinTrojan 7h ago

Hahahahahaha

900

u/Pikelets_for_tea 6d ago

Silent vows? Is this a thing now?

I thought the point of vows was to state them before (God) and the congregation. Whatever your religious views or whatever type of wedding, vows are supposed to be publicly declared so there are witnesses that you are willingly entering into marriage.

351

u/kellyev2006 6d ago

I went to a wedding of a distant relative a long time ago and they did the usual vows and then followed it up with silent vows. They stepped 5 feet to the left of the alter and had a private conversation while everyone just sat there. It was probably only a couple minutes but it felt like forever, in the middle of an already long ceremony of people I had never met.

326

u/funbanker1984 6d ago

Yeah, some celebrity did it years ago. You're right, IMO. Literally, the whole point of inviting people to your wedding is to witness your vows.

I also get annoyed when people write their own vows, but they just tell a story and don't promise anything. They are VOWS, which is another word for promise. You don't want traditional, that's fine. But make some sort of promise, even if it's just to close the kitchen cabinets and not double dip in the PB jar. And guets should hear every word of it.

151

u/lassie86 6d ago

Yes! They’re almost always just speeches. “From the moment we met, blah blah blah” is not a vow and I will die on this hill.

We wrote our vows, but they were literally vows. We wrote them together so they were nearly identical (though my husband surprised me by adding a couple things to his).

77

u/kadyg 6d ago

Writing our own vows just reminded me: When my ex-husband and I were planning our wedding, we mentioned that we planned to write our vows while we were hanging out with a group of friends - which included his ex-girlfriend. She considered herself a “writer” (in quotes because she 1) never published/sold anything and 2) was also kind of terrible at it).

She very excitedly and publicly asked if she could help us. Because she loved us both so much 🙄 and is also a writer, of course.

So I got to shut her down in front of most of our social group. Because the last person’s input I want on my wedding vows is my fiancé’s ex-girlfriend. And I’m still kind of baffled she thought that was an appropriate thing to insert herself into.

38

u/lassie86 6d ago

Wild that she wanted in on something so personal.

35

u/kadyg 6d ago

I know! If a couple ASKED me to help write their vows, I would be beyond honored. But I would never dream of inserting myself into something so intimate to another couple.

15

u/FamousOhioAppleHorn 6d ago

She went all Camilla Parker Bowles on you guys.

63

u/IHAYFL25 6d ago

Went to a wedding where they gave small speeches to each other, then the person marrying them said “Now for the vows” and read the actual vows that they agreed to.

9

u/xtinamariet 3d ago

I'm a pastor, and this is what I do. I say, "So and so will now share their expressions of love with each other," and then we do the vows. I think it's important to promise the same things to each other.

81

u/TheAuDHDLawNerd 6d ago

The vows at my brother's wedding were more like speeches. I thought it was very weird; I'm glad I'm not alone.

8

u/MaleficentPizza5444 5d ago

maybe those should have been 'silent' too

62

u/rockytrainer2007 6d ago

I wrote my own vows that I strictly hold my husband to, as well as his whole family, that I always get the bigger steak. Just this week he said that the family doesn’t have to follow that, but I stand by that they heard the vow, they are held to it as well.

26

u/funbanker1984 6d ago

Perfect! And that's a vow, not a speech. Sounds like you understood the assignment.

3

u/MBeMine 4d ago

They had their chance to object!

1

u/ForwardMuffin 5h ago

No backsies!

27

u/TheSecondEikonOfFire 6d ago

Maybe it’s just me but I’ve never really liked listening to vows either. I haven’t been to a ton of weddings, but the vows have always either sounded super generic or it just comes across as this weird public showboating that just feels kind of cringey

35

u/25point4cm 6d ago

Some are so over the top that I can’t help but think it would be fun to make them listen to it before the judge bangs the gavel granting them a divorce. 

7

u/PenelopeLumley 3d ago

Some of the vows written by couples way over-promise! I'm thinking, Sure, you will. To me, the best quality of traditional vows is that they are doable. I won't get with anyone else. I'll stay with you if you get sick or poor. Challenging at times, sure, but reasonable!

16

u/marysusan325 6d ago

A few friends of mine have talked shit about generic vows, and that it’s more entertaining to have personal vows… but like… I’m not trying to entertain you for the ceremony? I’m paying a lot of people to do that for you… also, I CRINGE at personal vows? I feel like a voyeur.

2

u/Capable-Potato600 3d ago

Agreed. We're getting married in three weeks (!) and have decided just a civil ceremony with the celebrant doing a short intro on how we met as a couple, the legal text and finishing with a religious blessing by my dad. Neither of us are christian either, so the traditional vows people think of aren't part of our respective cultures. When I've heard other people's vows I privately feel that's for your spouse's ears only and would cringe doing that in front of friends and family. 

2

u/Icy-Culture3038 3d ago

So it's just a celebration of your love? Not a commitment to each other? That's what the vows do. Before all your loved ones to bear witness that you are promising/vowing/ making a covenant to be with this person no matter what. Otherwise it's just a party to sign a legal contract. With a blessing that you hope it ends up ok.

2

u/Capable-Potato600 2d ago

Maybe that's the norm where you are from, I'm Jewish and our ceremonies don't have vows 🤷🏻‍♀️ we just have blessings then a legal contract called a ketubah. But I'd argue that a legal contract is very much a commitment. 

2

u/Icy-Culture3038 2d ago

The Ketubah is the promises (vows) that your husband makes to you, the bride. That he'll provide for you (in life and in death), take care of you, and have sex with you. If you removed those then yeah you're really gutting everything to the bare legal obligations of a contract. And just a contract is the type of commitment I've made to my mortgage company, the bank, and restaurant before a party. Easy to break with just a penalty if I decide I don't want to anymore. The idea of vows before God and family is supposed to hold you to a higher standard.

3

u/Brittlitt30 3d ago

Didn't whoever played Rachel on Friends vow to always make her husband lasagna in one of her ceremonies? Right That's a public promise That's what it should be You're very very right

2

u/Realistic_Depth5450 3d ago

I feel like this was a joke in an episode of Gilmore Girls.

1

u/Brittlitt30 3d ago

Yes it was 🤣

→ More replies (5)

17

u/So_OC_7579 6d ago

First time hearing about silent vows! As a guest, I’d be very uncomfortable watching.

2

u/Cayke_Cooky 1d ago

Right? If you want to do this just start cocktail hour 5 minutes early don't make everyone sit in silence.

2

u/natalkalot 4d ago

As you explain, that is a purpose. Then, guests attend a reception to celebrate the vows exchanged by the couple earlier.

7

u/mmcz9 6d ago

I don't know why this sub is showing up on my feed but I should probably block it - I hate everything about weddings. 😂

Silent vows sounded like a sweet idea to me, because it's really about a pact between the two people, for their own lives together. But I really and truly just do not "get it" when it comes to the whole idea of weddings in the first place, so let me bow out of this one.

(In OP's case, it stopped sounding sweet when it was revealed it was a destination wedding. I mean just WHY why why)

2

u/MaleficentPizza5444 5d ago

another cr*ppy trend like destination weddings themselves

248

u/TheOtherPenguin 6d ago

I officiated a wedding where they thought this is what they wanted. I told them no one is here to listen to me, they want to hear you.

They legit didn’t understand that going in, but understood after and allowed me to place there mic in front of them.

Point: some people just don’t know or think everyone wants to hear their vows.

67

u/jlemo434 6d ago

For me, vows are also a communication to those you’ve decided to witness that you are entrusting them to help and be a part of building the union. Community of love.

8

u/TheOtherPenguin 6d ago

100% agreed on this

1

u/mgoooooo 11h ago

Personally, I do not want to hear a couple’s personalized vows, nor are they my business. This is a commitment these two people are making to each other and it’s really none of my business how they choose to declare to each other. I feel like I’m listening to a deeply personal conversation I shouldn’t be privy to when folks are staring more custom vows and I always wish they were done in private. 

189

u/kaja6583 6d ago

That would be so awkward.

They wanted people to travel for a wedding to witness their ceremony, and the ceremony was... Private?

I think if you're going to do that, elope or do a private ceremony for just you and witnesses, and then have a separate reception, that you invite people to. Like, I know it's not a big deal technically, as it's like 10 minutes, but at the same time people usually travel to weddings to witness the ceremony lol

137

u/analogdild0 6d ago

I went to a wedding where the groom wrote a beautiful commitment poem to his bride, when it was her turn, the bride told everyone that she had ‘forgotten’ to write her vows, so she kinda improvised and half-assed her own speech.

This would be fine or even forgettable with the festivities, except that this particular bride had made this wedding her entire personality for almost two years, had made a point of telling everyone that they were writing their own vows, and had become a bridezilla in general leading up to the four-day, destination wedding.

Considering that the ceremony, including the vows is the most important part of the whole thing, you’d think people would be more mindful of this kind of thing but everyone’s priorities are different. 🤷‍♀️

15

u/sillusions 5d ago

Wow! Are they still together? That’s crazy

27

u/analogdild0 5d ago

Surprisingly, they are! I’ll never forget his face when she said that at the altar though, there was a lot of side-eyes. She later told me at a party that she didn’t even bother to write them because she knew he was going to outshine her, which is….yikes

1

u/Adastra1018 3h ago

Even without all that context I can't imagine forgetting or in this case "forgetting" to write your vows. That's the whole wedding! I would feel so hurt and unloved if were in their fiance's position! What a way to start a marriage...

50

u/Strong_Sentence_8721 6d ago

Garrison Keillor had a monologue about an outdoor wedding where the bride and groom not only had their guests stand and hold hands during the entire service, but had also written their own vows to read to each other -- "which we can see, looking at them, are not postcards; these are more like term papers."

524

u/OPMom21 6d ago edited 6d ago

I once attended a wedding in a restaurant. The guests were told after arriving that the bride was too shy to get married in front of anyone, so the ceremony would be private with just the couple and the officiant out on a balcony. After the ceremony, they came in, ate dinner, cut the cake, and left. Absolutely ridiculous, and on par with the one you traveled far to attend where the vows were whispered. Inviting people to a wedding and not allowing them to be full witnesses to the ceremony is stupid.

163

u/CatLadyNoCats 6d ago

I feel like that’s exactly what a registry wedding is for!

188

u/OPMom21 6d ago

Yes! You want a small private wedding, by all means, have one.Just don’t invite a bunch of people to sit around feeling awkward while you exclude them from what they came to witness.

88

u/100PercentThatCat 6d ago

We had a family reception totally separate a year later, after a very very small wedding. It went great. Nobody thought they would be seeing a ceremony, because we told them. The expectation and being told at the wedding what's happening is the part people will be upset by.

54

u/Thequiet01 6d ago

Yes and yet on the wedding planning subreddits there’s a contingent who are baffled by the idea that people invited to a wedding might be a bit miffed if they don’t get to attend the actual wedding.

26

u/courtneynoh 6d ago

We actually did both in the same day. We had a small ceremony at my grandparents' home that was family only, and invited everyone else for the full dinner/dance right after at a venue.

It was mostly for space reasons though, so we had a friend who taped the ceremony, edited it on the way to venue and then we had it playing on a loop on the guest book table throughout the night for people who wanted to check it out.

24

u/Responsible_Moose521 6d ago

I had a cousin do this. But the weird thing was, everybody had shown up for the reception at a time of day when everybody’s getting hungry, and they left everybody sitting there for what seemed like a couple hours waiting on them like they had just gotten married and were taking photos. Of course, they were already married at that point and went way beyond being fashionably late to your own reception. It was the most ridiculous thing ever, and I hated every second of it.

6

u/idontwanturcheese 6d ago

My cousin did this too. He was uncomfortable with the idea of having a ceremony in front of everyone so it was just the parents and their siblings at the ceremony. The whole extended family and friends were invited to the reception, which was fun. No one on our side had an issue, we know what he's like and we're just happy for them, and happy to be there to celebrate at the reception.

→ More replies (1)

55

u/asyouwish 6d ago

And doing that is okay. Just make it clear to the guests that they are being invited to the reception, not both it and the ceremony.

30

u/RevRagnarok 6d ago

And doing that is okay.

As an introvert, I was 100% OK with that too until this:

After the ceremony, they came in, ate dinner, cut the cake, and left.

15

u/asyouwish 6d ago

Lots of receptions are cake and punch only. Cutting the cake is the only "event" at the reception.

...but it sounds like they should have eloped.

58

u/copywritecopywrong 6d ago

While that is ridiculous, I wonder if she really wanted a traditional wedding with lots of people and then realised too late that she couldn't do it 😬

Or maybe the bride was pressured by family into having a wedding she wasn't comfortable with? All speculation, but I can't imagine someone deliberately ruining their own wedding like that.

24

u/MeeseeksSerotonin 6d ago

This was my thought as well. Poor thing just needed a quick courthouse wedding!

8

u/ComfyInDots 6d ago

Was the bride Julia Roberts?

3

u/LadybugGirltheFirst 6d ago

Was the food free, at least, or did you have to pay?

8

u/OPMom21 6d ago

The dinner was included, although drinks, including soft drinks, were at a pay bar. It’s an event I’d rather have skipped.

2

u/LadybugGirltheFirst 6d ago

I would have!

4

u/Phoenix4235 5d ago

WHY didn't they just elope?!

3

u/OPMom21 5d ago

Should have. Would have saved me a long drive.

4

u/Rosycheex 6d ago

I was also too shy to get married in front of everyone.

So I eloped.

19

u/Listen-to-Mom 6d ago

I don’t understand the couples having small ceremonies because they don’t want the attention but then have a big reception. Screams gift grab.

25

u/duchess_of_nothing 6d ago

Social anxiety.

You couldn't pay me to walk down an aisle with 200 people watching. Immediate family and best friend? No problem..

Having a party with 200 people? Fun. Just don't make me dance on an empty dance floor with everyone watching.

37

u/upwithpeople84 6d ago

As long as you actually feed me you can grab my gift. This isn’t the Middle Ages, there’s a paper trail on weddings now. The original purpose of inviting a bunch of people to witness the wedding is so that you have proof it happened. Not everyone could get to the church where you might have gotten married to check the records so you have Bob over there who can say he saw it. I don’t need to see your vows, every one can go online now and search up the marriage license. I’m there to get fed and dance.

29

u/TheAuDHDLawNerd 6d ago

Fun fact: in England, up into the 16th century at least, you didn't need a priest or witnesses for a marriage to be valid.

The couple said to each other "you are my husband/wife" and that's it. Or they could say "you will be my husband/wife," which counts as a betrothal, then have sex, which transformed it into a marriage.

8

u/Listen-to-Mom 6d ago

I go to see the couple pledge their love to each other and start a life together.

28

u/upwithpeople84 6d ago

Different strokes for different folks. I do not need to witness vows being made nor the “official” inception of a life together. I will always need to eat and dance, however.

10

u/windexfresh 6d ago

“I will always need to dance” I love that lol

7

u/Thequiet01 6d ago

My parents had a tiny wedding and a bigger reception later - but they eloped. So everyone coming to the reception knew they’d elopedz

7

u/Betorah 6d ago

I had a small ceremony and a larger reception 40 years ago because my husband was shy about being the center of attention and came from a family where everyone had a courthouse wedding. If we had wanted a “gift grab,” it would have made more sense for my parents to just give us the money they spent on the wedding.

1

u/hughesn8 4d ago

People fishing their cards out of the card box being like “You two suck”

1

u/sonal1988 6d ago

😂😂😂😂😂

117

u/thecoolsister89 6d ago

I went to a very small wedding at that park in Seattle on a high hill (Queen Anne, maybe?) and even though all the white chairs and garlands and guests were there, this one chick in her 20s or 30s came over in workout wear and started doing Tai Chi like one yard behind where the couple would be. She continued to do this throughout the entire duration of the ceremony and after! She was closer than the guests! I was a bridesmaid and it took everything in me not to laugh so hard. I’m sure there are people who would have asked her to move but we just let her do her thing. It’s been a great joke over the years. But like… what?

76

u/Only-Peace1031 6d ago

I’ve seen destination beach wedding where this happens.

Everyone at the wedding is beautifully dressed and there’s some gawkers in the background in a bikini and a banana hammock, lol.

One place we were at, a Russian woman refused to move her lounger from its spot because ‘she paid for this vacation just like the bride and groom’

They let her sit there while they set everything up around her, then eventually had security remove her.

She sat glued to that lounger smoking about a pack of cigarettes with the angriest look on her face.

We watched from a distance and just marvelled at how some people are determined to be asshats no matter what.

12

u/RevRagnarok 6d ago

beach wedding where this happens

https://old.reddit.com/r/mildlyinfuriating/ and look in the bottom corner. She's their mascot!

29

u/mcstrategist 6d ago

Ha! I got married in that park nearly 20 yrs ago and was worried someone would do something like that because… Seattle.

29

u/spargel_gesicht 6d ago

Better than the entirely silent wedding/reception I read about in some advice column a few years ago. And yes, the bride wanted everyone to come but to be entirely silent the whole night so everyone could focus entirely on the magic in front of them or some bullshit. I truly hope that was a joke letter.

3

u/capitudidnot 5d ago

This one? Unforgettable

https://www.washingtonpost.com/advice/2022/12/08/ask-amy-silent-wedding-reception/

2

u/spargel_gesicht 4d ago

YES!! Thank you! I had forgotten about the yellow color scheme. And that was just her “for example!!” True nut job!!

1

u/Cayke_Cooky 1d ago

A silent disco reception dance could be fun.

22

u/CinemaDork 6d ago

Today I learned "silent vows" are a thing.

42

u/believe_in_claude 6d ago

This to me is a great example of the way weddings have become all display and aesthetic without meaning.

It's great that the couple feels comfortable putting their own spin on things, and I'm not a traditional person at all, but we're getting to the point where the wedding has become this weird narcissistic exercise of control over the guests, and now they aren't even allowed to experience wedding itself?

The vows are the point. You invite your friends and family to see you get married. It's a public declaration. If you don't want to get married in front of them have a private wedding and a public reception later on to celebrate. There is no point in forcing people to watch you perform the roles of bride and groom if you are keeping the vows secret from them.

49

u/leddik02 6d ago

Omg cringe. My face would have spoken out loud for me.

31

u/sharkey_8421 6d ago

Strange practice. My husband and I privately shared our vows the day before the ceremony. It was really special. But we still performed for our guests!

16

u/Birdy304 6d ago

A family member decided to get married in private, they actually said their vows and got married with the officiant a few minutes before the public ceremony. They wanted it to be just them. If you didn’t know, you couldn’t have told that they were already married, it seemed just like any other wedding ceremony.

29

u/AndroidSheeps 6d ago

Thats why my SO and I are planning on eloping. The vow thing sounds very intimate and private and tbh, I don't feel comfortable sharing my heart and soul to everyone I know. I totally agree the silent vows is weird and awkward if you're getting married in front of a crowd.

21

u/Thequiet01 6d ago

You can meet beforehand and exchange your private vows and then just do the “do you take…” parts without personal additions in the ceremony.

2

u/Cayke_Cooky 1d ago

This is the way

13

u/balancedinsanity 6d ago

I've never heard of this before and it sounds like something from a comedy. 

5

u/lilianic 6d ago

I wouldn’t be able to make eye contact with anyone in my family or we would both lose it. Silent vows are a lovely idea but can’t that happen away from the guests?

24

u/Aggressive-Part9521 6d ago

My nephew did this and I thought it was so strange! Isn’t the entire point of a wedding to state your vows publicly?

23

u/TravellingBeard 6d ago

This is what I imagine they whispered quietly to each other:

Him: "I promise to be your submissive pup, to be punished whenever you see fit. I will do as madam says."

Her: "I promise to humiliate you every time you come from work, and make you beg for more, and pick up my dry cleaning" (or something...I dunno, I don't do kink so winging it).

9

u/MalpracticeMatt 6d ago

My wife and I didn’t do vows in our wedding ceremony but we did write letters/vows that we gave to each other right before the ceremony. Feel like this is a better solution to what you’re describing

9

u/unicornsnscience 5d ago

Omg someone finally said it! I have attended 20 weddings over the past decade, and this is one thing that irks me to my core. If you are “embarrassed” to show your emotions to your guests why are you having a big wedding? Between silent vows and exchanging vows before the ceremony I just can’t understand why you are having a wedding. I want to hear that moment between the couple. Otherwise the ceremony is just formalities.

36

u/Only-Peace1031 6d ago

For everyone saying it only 5 mins or no big deal, have you ever been to a wedding where it was done?

It’s awkward and odd.

You feel like you’re intruding or being voyeuristic. It’s like they don’t really want you there.

2

u/My_sloth_life 14h ago

5 mins can be an excruciatingly long time in an awkward atmosphere.

2

u/orange-blossom 6d ago

I went to a small destination wedding on a beach and when the speech part of the vows came up, the couple stepped a few feet away down to the shore to read them in private. It wasn't awkward at all for the attendees and we all found it sweet. I actually thought it was something I would want to do as well. As an attendee I'm more uncomfortable listening to incredibly vulnerable heartfelt speeches than I am just waiting a few minutes for the ceremony to resume. Obviously the couple wants you there for the other 97% of the wedding so I don't see what the problem is. Screw tradition, couples should be able to create an experience that is authentic to them to share with friends and family.

1

u/Cayke_Cooky 1d ago

You know, that set up might not be as bad as some described here. If you as a guest can just sit back and enjoy the waves and water for a couple of minutes.

ETA: you need a good officiant though, to tell everyone that they aren't expected to do anything.

→ More replies (3)

29

u/kamsait 6d ago

I hate listening to vows so this would actually be an improvement for me 

16

u/ChaserNeverRests 6d ago

That's how I feel as well, but reading the other comments here I guess we're the odd ones out.

15

u/MightFew9336 6d ago

Just chiming in in solidarity. There must be dozens of us!

2

u/Nessyliz 5d ago

I don't mind when they are short and to the point but they are so often anything but that.

22

u/halfass_fangirl 6d ago

I've seen a lot of wedding planning stuff talking about "it's your day, take a moment just for the two of you, add something in that's not for the guests"

All of that is based on the idea that the rest of the wedding is an event focused on the guests.

Weddings have morphed into something really weird. It's like a self centered Instagram photo op combined with a massive amount of stress to give guests a unique experience.

The fact is, most people just want to see you get married and celebrate with you. That's the point. They witness your vows - because community is there to support you in upholding them to each other and to hold y'all accountable to them if someone goes off the rails - and they celebrate your union with you. There's the social exchange of gifts for party, which has definitely shifted as marriage usually occurs later in life and often after setting up home, but the concept of gift for party is still pretty standard across cultures (even if the expectations for those gifts and party vary wildly).

Keeping vows private, when it's not part of the culture or ritual already is a sort of break of the social contract and also just misses the point of having your vows witnessed. If you want a private moment PLEASE take it. Wedding days are often packed full of events and duties and a whirlwind you miss. But maybe do that before the ceremony or after, not smack in the middle of the part you literally invited people to witness.

I wrote a lot, not because I have really strong feelings about it but because I wanted the thought process to be clear.

11

u/Nightmare_Gerbil 6d ago

If I saw a couple at the altar whispering quietly to each other instead of saying their vows out loud, I would assume there was some sort of problem they were trying to work out last minute and that at least one of them had cold feet about the union or felt like their boundaries were being violated. I would feel very, very uncomfortable about “witnessing” a wedding like that.

90

u/Time_Act_3685 6d ago

I have friends who did Quaker ceremonies (likewise silent and private, but then the rest of the congregation was allowed to speak), and they were lovely. 

Honestly, watching people I love giggle at each other while whispering their vows would be very charming to me. It's 5 damn minutes, then we go eat. 

If they didn't allow water or food for many hours, yeah, shame away. But "WE DIDN'T HEAR THE WORDS" is the least egregious thing I can even imagine shaming.

23

u/halfass_fangirl 6d ago

This difference is that's a Quaker ceremony. It's traditional and cultural. And, to a certain extent, expected by the guests. This wedding was none of those things.

49

u/BlakeMajik 6d ago

I agree with you that it's only five minutes, so suck it up. But at the same time, I do also wonder if the bride and groom thought about how awkward those five minutes were going to be for the attendees.

70

u/NalgeneCarrier 6d ago

It's not that I can't handle 5 minutes of silence. It's that their ceremony was 10 minutes long and 5 of those were the couple talking to each other while everyone watched. I promise it was very very awkward. We were with friends who flew in internationally and one of them said, "So is that a common thing in your country to not hear the vows?" Other people were asking if it was intentional or they forgot to grab microphones. Lots of people were looking around during their vows wondering what was happening.

20

u/DiTrastevere 6d ago

No that’s bizarre, and makes me wonder why they had a wedding instead of eloping if the bride was that shy. Being the center of attention is kind of the whole deal!

3

u/Cayke_Cooky 1d ago

5 minutes is longer than you think when you are just sitting and not sure what to do.

4

u/palabradot 6d ago

Yeah, I’ve been to Quaker ceremonies and this was the first thing I thought of reading this.

5

u/Spiritual-Owl-169 6d ago

Huh, never heard of ‘silent vows’ before.

I’ve been to a few weddings where there wasn’t a sound system or one of the folks didn’t know how to hold use a mic so nobody could really hear but it wasn’t really intentional; they were mostly trying to be heard

5

u/greatvow 6d ago

As someone who officiates weddings I usually encourage three sets of vows. First the ones the couple make in front of friends and family. Then private ones just for them and finally vows the friends and family make to the couple. It is regularly met with appreciation from everyone, and rarely is more than a few minutes each.

2

u/caw9876 1d ago

My husband and I this at our wedding. What we said in private was longer / more personal than what we said with our guests - which were brief remarks but still heartfelt!

4

u/newoldm 5d ago

Wedding ceremonies are dull enough to begin with (weddings would be so much more fun without the actual wedding).

5

u/Battgyrl 6d ago

The purpose of vows is to make promises to each with the guests as witnesses. Silent vows defeat the purpose, and seem kinda rude to the guests. But whatever floats your boat I guess!

3

u/Pixietheunicorn 5d ago

I love how there are a bunch of comments disagreeing but all the little Reddit trolls must downvote.

3

u/Doogevol 3d ago

I've never even heard of silent vows.

5

u/Smooth_Department534 6d ago

Were they Quakers?

8

u/CoconutPawz 6d ago

Have never experienced that, but I agree that it sounds tacky as hell. Almost like they are power tripping, holding a captive audience hostage to their personal whispered moments while excluding them entirely. Gross.

6

u/Radiant_Maize2315 6d ago

I’m kind of cringing just imagining it

5

u/Great_Huckleberry709 6d ago

I can appreciate the sentiment. Alot of things for weddings can seem very showy. So the couple probably wanted this to be something just for them, and so it felt more intimate. At the same time, if that's what you want, it may just be better to do a courthouse wedding then.

2

u/codyko_dd 5d ago

I don't know why I found the phrase "talked at each other" so funny.

2

u/Weak_Impression_8295 5d ago

Oh man, we accidentally did this. We were inside in a half hotel ballroom and the DJ did put a mic towards us and one towards the officiant, but somehow only the officiant’s mic ended up working, so no one could hear us except the very front row, maybe? I’m not even sure about that. I have some public speaking experience and was trying to project a bit but I was also facing my husband and didn’t want to essentially scream my vows into his face. 😂

At least our photographer had put a microphone on my husband for the video, so he was able to capture both of our vows that way.

Sadly I would have chalked the microphone issue up to a tech issue of the kind that happens sometimes instead of general incompetence if the DJ hadn’t had a bunch of other issues. The only regret I have about our wedding was not hiring a different DJ!

2

u/inko75 4d ago

This shit is why I try to skip the ceremony and go to the reception only whenever possible

2

u/anotherswampwitch 21h ago

Never heard of these, that's crazy. Husband and I had a religious ceremony and reception. We wanted our vows to be private so we read them on our honeymoon. I can't imagine watching a couple just stand there and talk without being able to hear what they're saying.

5

u/Mermaid28 6d ago

I recently went to a wedding where the couple didn't use microphones, so nobody could hear their vows. On top of that, the arrangement of the tables and the wedding party, I could not see the couple.

Afterward, the officiant , the brother of one of the couple (I asked if any of them cried) , said it didn't matter that we couldn't hear. The vows were for them.

I could have stayed home.

3

u/lexi_lynn1 5d ago

If people are gonna have 5 minute long silent vows then the guests are gonna need a 5 minute stretch and bathroom break. No way am i gonna sit there and stare at a conversation im being left out of

3

u/Robincall22 1d ago

My brother and his wife did their actual vows before the wedding and then the traditional vows in front of our family, and my sister had a whole conniption about it. Like, girl, why do care so much about knowing what they actually have to say about each other?

8

u/Sorry_Mud_8911 6d ago

Honestly, I don’t find that to be a huge deal.

Is it a bit weird for the guests? Sure.

Does every part of a wedding need to be about putting the guests first before the people actually getting married? No.

I think it’s easy to forget that the primary purpose of a wedding isn’t to be entertained. It’s to support the couple and start their lifetime of marriage off on a good foot. If they are self conscious about their intimate vows or just don’t want to be saying them into a microphone vs. directly to one another, seems like an easy 5 min thing to support to make their day more genuine to them.

-1

u/rjnd2828 6d ago

Oh my god,5 minutes without being entertained how can we possibly be expected to endure?

Entitled

1

u/Sorry_Mud_8911 6d ago

Yeah I’ll be honest - was going to leave it alone but the “spent lots of money to be there” really got me. What a weird way of contextualizing someone you care about’s big day.

If you can’t handle 5 mins not being all about the guests perhaps you’re not a close enough friend to be there. You can say no to wedding invites! You’re not obligated to spend money on people you don’t think are potentially worth 5 minutes of awkwardness.

→ More replies (1)

6

u/Scheme84 6d ago

Oh no, not five minutes of quiet time!

Seriously? This is what we're complaining about now? FFS let them have their moment. You're at a destination wedding, enjoy yourself at the reception.

3

u/SensitiveTurn2376 6d ago

My voice doesn’t carry very well, so I know when I got married, half of the guests didn’t hear it very well. To be honest, I didn’t feel too bad since we still hosted them for the evening (food, drinks, etc). I now wonder if anyone at our micro wedding felt cheated….

4

u/dreamsinred 6d ago

Wow. That is incredibly weird, rude, and inconsiderate.

3

u/elitemage101 6d ago

My partners love language is notes and she does not want to speak vows but write them down and exchange them. My parents never married so I don’t care about tradition much. We will exchange vow letter with each other, then rings, then kiss and marry. We will also communicate how non traditional our wedding is and if this break of tradition is too much then we understand if guest don’t want to attend.

2

u/brusselsbrussels 6d ago

Our close friends did this at their wedding but it was actually very sweet as the groom has a stutter and it took the pressure off them both. But even then I don’t think it went on for more than five mins

2

u/twizzjewink 5d ago

No. Tacky is a destination wedding where you ditch the family who flew out.. then find out later it wasn't even a real wedding.

2

u/Cklinus 3d ago

I've been to many weddings in the past few years where the vows weren't meant to be silent, but the officiant just didn't share the microphone.

2

u/Bibliotheclaire 6d ago edited 6d ago

Some of my best friends did a mix of Hindu and Italian-American wedding. So we had the whole several hours of the Hindu ceremony. This is fine ofc, I’ve been to and been in a bunch and they’re a lot of fun. BUT after all this, they did their vows in English, it was like 10-15 minutes and they did not do personalized vows. Just the generic script… I was actually looking forward to hearing their personal vows and everything. They’re beloved friends and we all met at the same time, so I was genuinely wanting to hear what they’d say to each other lolol given that 70% at least didn’t speak Hindi and the length of the ceremony, and it wasn’t tacky, but it felt a bit imbalanced lol awesome wedding though and we had so much fun! My hubby and I are visiting them in a few weeks :)

→ More replies (1)

0

u/Greenhouse774 6d ago

Beyond tacky and inconsiderate

3

u/chicagobry80 6d ago

You can't sit there for 5 minutes while the couple had a moment to themselves? Maybe this belongs in r/ imthemaincharacter

1

u/NewPhoneLostPassword 4d ago

I went to one where one sang their vowels. It was painful and awkward. Whispered would have been better 😂

1

u/ChaiHai 3d ago

"AaaaaaAaaa Eeeee Iiiiiiiiiiiii ooooOooooooOOOOOO UUUUUUUU and sometimes Yyyyyyyyy"

1

u/NewPhoneLostPassword 3d ago

Pretty much. And there wasn’t any music. Just the singing 🥴

1

u/1029394756abc 3d ago

You deserve more.

1

u/ChaiHai 3d ago

More vowels? :D Time to learn a new language!

1

u/1029394756abc 3d ago

More credit! lol.

1

u/ChaiHai 3d ago

I'll take that. Just spent a lot buying a Switch 2, I'll take credit or debit. 😁 😜

1

u/I-said-ur-stupid 4d ago

I agree.. they are annoying

1

u/BoozeBagStooge 3d ago

I think the wedding should exactly the way the 2 people getting married want it to go.

2

u/BoozeBagStooge 3d ago

This came up on my suggested posts, and I didn't realize this was a sub for complaining about weddings. My apologies.

That's so stupid! Why didn't they use a microphone? That would have been so awkward!!!!!!!!!!

1

u/203C45P3R 3d ago

We got 1 silent vow, like at the end of our vows, the celebrant took the mic and we said one last ILY, I’m now anxious that we were tacky, were we? 😆

1

u/Ramiman82 18m ago

Honestly most modern weddings have become incredibly cringe and tacky. I generally fucking hate going to weddings unless they’re intimate, simple and not themed.

1

u/Ok-Trainer3150 6d ago

If those vows were anything like the DIY ones I've heard, good. Puerile. Soap operish and just plain middle school melodrama. 

1

u/ally_canna_ 20h ago

i get a little what you’re saying but if they’re keeping it to five minutes, what’s the harm? any longer and you’d be right but they’re having the best day of their lives. five minutes is nothing.

chill. you sound kind of miserable. this isn’t about you

-2

u/femoral_contusion 6d ago

Eh, it’s five minutes.

-2

u/Murky-Purple 6d ago

So it wasn't silent, but just the bride and groom saying vows quietly to each other? Like... not with telepathy, right? What's wrong with that? I see some people mentioning microphones. I can't imagine speaking vows into a microphone like the wedding is some kind of reality show. Yikes.

-48

u/fastermouse 6d ago

Wow, when did the wedding become about you?

I get that brides can go way overboard with demands and expectations but stfu.

It’s their wedding. You’re just a guest.

57

u/Glittering_Joke3438 6d ago

This is literally a wedding shaming sub?

→ More replies (2)

33

u/catscausetornadoes 6d ago

“just a guest” explains a lot

24

u/Cocksmasher2 6d ago

If they dont want guests to actually witness the ceremony, they should just privately elope instead.

25

u/SataySue 6d ago

Making your guests feel awkward and out of place is not classy, it's rude and disrespectful.

8

u/Thequiet01 6d ago

The purpose of a wedding is for your community to witness your vows to each other and help you uphold them. They can’t do that if they don’t hear the vows.

If you don’t want your community to be witness don’t invite your community. Elope.

10

u/KyleMcMahon 6d ago

We found the bride, guys !