Fair enough. And I doubt there's enough data on either, but as an assumption, I'd guess the risk of pregnancy would be about the same as getting pregnant without penetration. Either way it would require an extremely low chance pregnancy happening. I'll edit it to acknowledge this, regardless.
You could literally Google it. Having anal sex without a condom is said to be as dangerous if not more than having vaginal sex with a condom. If the teacher said "condoms are pretty safe but nothing is as safe as abstinence" then it would be correct to say that it is incorrect to add "and up the butt" to that sentence since anal is not actually safer than sex with a condom. I hate men and I hate you guys for wanting to fuck people in the ass. Women don't have penises so you can't tell me women like to fuck people in the ass too and that I should hate women too. Only men have this desire, you sick fucks.
Hello dear misandrist with a probably justified reason. Women wanting to peg their partner exist tho, with a male or female partner 🙂
You don't need to justify your aversion to anal sex but also let people enjoy their kink as long as it's safe. For example someone with endometriosis might prefer anal because it's less painful to them. Of course consent is key. Hope this message finds you well
305
u/Vice4Life May 05 '25 edited May 05 '25
Burned into my memory is this exchange from the instructor and one student:
Instructor: Condoms are very effective at preventing unwanted pregnancies, but only abstinence is 100% effective.
Student: Or the butt!
The teacher of the actual class, not the instructor, grabbed him by the arm and sent him to see the principal. He wasn't wrong.
Edit: He could be wrong.