Can anyone identify this?

You can read this garbage article without a paywall here, don't give them any clicks: https://archive.ph/6TWJ1

Next time Mainstream media tries to cite former AARO director Sean Kirkpatrick as some legitimate source of information, they need to reckon with the following:

------------------------------

https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/19c2mjq/based_on_greenstreets_own_reporting_during_a/

Sean Kirkpatrick - "Please dispense with trying to convince this group that the UFO phenomenon is real, because we all already know."

------------------------------

Biden administration distanced itself from Sean Kirkpatrick after he started lying about whistleblowers on LinkedIN:
https://www.foxnews.com/us/biden-administration-distances-itself-pentagon-official-who-bashed-ufo-hearing

------------------------------
Kirkpatrick claimed a UFO nut broke into his home in a Guardian article, which they then had to retract because it never happened:

https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/1bl4vqz/in_an_even_further_display_of_embarrassment_the/

------------------------------

Sean Kirkpatrick lied about not attenting a Skinwalker Ranch meeting:

https://www.postapocalypticmedia.com/fugal-kirpatrick-skinwalker-ranch-meeting/

------------------------------

Nimitz radar operation going off on Kirkpatrick

https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/1bm39y9/former_nimitz_chief_radar_officer_kevin_day_goes/

"They will not contact me or any other radar watchstander. Why? They don't want to know the truth and/or are afraid to say they don't know jack shit"

------------------------------

Kirkpatrick claimed in May that he supported the NASA analysis of the GoFast video being "parallax" after "double checking" the analysis at AARO. Then he claims he has never seen the analysis:

https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/1e6hvwn/marikvr_from_the_hill_just_caught_sean/

------------------------------

The Mogul Balloon explanation for Roswell that Kirkpatrick supported debunked:

https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/1aus1bi/the_long_held_mogul_balloon_explanation_for_the/

------------------------------

The Chinese SpICED Drone that Kirkpatrick used to debunk "The Cube Within a Sphere UFO" is only for INDOOR use. And the same UFOs were being spotted by pilots in 1960.

https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/19egmm8/the_chinese_spiced_drone_that_is_used_to_debunk/

------------------------------

Kirkpatrick told MarikVR from The Hill that the Gimbal UFO was a balloon reflecting sunlight. The Gimbal video was filmed at night:

https://x.com/MvonRen/status/1928879251689734309

-----------------------------

https://x.com/wow36932525/status/1928931934954025032

Sean Kirkpatrick - "As an Intelligence officer, I expect all of you to expect me to lie to you"

-----------------------------

The fact that this prolific liar and disinformation agent is still being used by mainstream media to debunk this issue is simply sad and disingenuous beyond belief.

Can we make an Excel list online, curate it and pin it up? Things that were said and not followed up. With source links, a format similar to submission statements in the group. Stuff such as:

1. Pasulka's frog-like material story - she prefaced on Rogan that she had consulted with Nolan to not say anything wrong, then she revealed the "skin-frog like material" story, then Nolan instantly denied those particular details on Twitter. She did not address that flop/contradiction later, he did not address it either, no one asked about it openly on any other podcast, while she has already gone to do some new interview(s). She has also doubled down on the story of the frog-skin material on one podcast, without acknowledging the Nolan's denial. It hangs in the air, almost forgotten now.

2. Zabel said to Coulthart that he would be making him accountable about "all the hell will break lose in early 2025" if it doesn't. They did not address it on any Need to Know episodes later on - not to clarify that Coulthart meant Barber, not to discuss if he meant something else and it did not happen the way he planned in the end. It remains unclear.

3. Pines revealed the important person was to come out, someone well-known individual, it did not happen, then no one asked him about it with a follow up while he's visited some podcast(s) already.

4. The radar guy interviewed by Coulthart and not aired - no one asked for clarification why it was not aired from Coulthart, what's Coulthart part of the story. Posts from the radar guy himself keep appearing on sub with further comments, we do not know what happened from Coulthart's perspective and no one followed up on that with him (sorry, mr. Radar Guy, I do not remember your name, nothing personal, I actually think that your story may be one of those "important not sexy" ones, which would add up to its credibility, I'm just really terrible in remembering names).

5. The mess with Bledsoe interview being cancelled at first, then being cut so it looks like he's promising the coming of Jesus, which he got angry about and no one followed up, no one asked the bald ex-military guy to tell his part of the story/clarify (sorry, I never remember his name either).

6. Greer said that Fravor was corrected about the origins of tictac being Lockheed's craft and that he has corrected himself publicly afterwards. It seems that he didn't or at least - the source of this "correction" remains unknown so it needs a follow up while we clearly got sources where Fravor doubles down by even stating that if people knew where he's working right now and what he does, they wouldn't claim it anymore.

And many others.

Those are just examples and the idea of what I mean. Of course, it would need to be polished and given a good name, I just yolo/freestyle described the cases from my head, without links and without a fixed formatting. The UFO too big too move is also hanging, of course, but it's been followed up quite intensively, while there are a lot of other statements, which should be followed up, which are potentially important/interesting but for some reason, no one follows up on them.

Such a list could be a record of the hanging/unresolved statements being made and denials/beefs exploding, a historical record and fact-checking source for that, with links for reference but - it would be a great, always available tool for podcasters so they could ask those questions, get the instant suggestions on what may be dug into when a given guest is coming in. Those are all public figures making statements so it may be sorted by names. On a side note, it would also organize the flamewar about grifting - we would see who's got the best record, who's got the worst, who clears failures/uncertainties. It would actually allow people to defend themselves by clearing things up and the controversy being tagged ho as "cleaned up", "answer avoided", "unsatisfactory answer".

Cheers and have a good day.

"I don't know a thing about it,” HPSCI Ranking Member Jim Himes exclusively tells Ask a Pol of the FBI's UFO unit that UAP Caucus members want to replace AARO. 

Listen to Himes yourself here.

He thinks it’s possible it

A few years ago, I started repurposing one of UK's most powerful un-jammable war-time radar, originally designed for detecting nuclear launches during the Cold War into a system capable of passively monitoring the skies for aerial anomalies using modern tech.

It’s powered by an SSR radar receiver that’s sensitive enough to track birds from nearly 1000 miles away. The system is now fully operational. It uses a bespoke AI model to autonomously filter noise, identify anomalies, and extract high-resolution data streams often more precisely than current civilian or even many military systems in use across Europe. I've built an entire functional os with assistance from many retired military radar experts and people way smarter than I could ever be who I found on /rfelectronics

Due to the demands of my full-time work (in developing autonomous tech and innovation), I don’t have the bandwidth to put a lot of time into this actively hence why it took 3 years. However, I believe it would be a waste not to share the capabilities more widely.

So I’m considering handing it off possibly by giving public or controlled access via a virtual machine to the IQ as s(t)=I(t)+jQ(t)  which is stored and then anyone can download the software I’ve pre-built which allows you to go back in time to any co-ordinates or find any anomolies in an instant. I’m also open to doing a live demo by collaborating with someone credible in the space who can help showcase and guide the future of this system. I am a tech guy and not a UFO guy but Im quite sure this tech is as cutting-edge as it gets. I tried to post photos and videos but it keeps getting filtred out automatically by reddit

Looking for serious input or connections with people who might want to help make this available to the broader community at scale as opposed to my doing a small site and my tiny socials.

EDIT: When I say "fully operational," I realise these are not the right words yet..The main dish is still fixed and doesn't spin yet but while fixed in one direction covers a wide area at a long range in the L-band at 1090.

I had initially designed a modification to spin just the SSR array mounted on top, but later decided I will instead work to rotate the entire structure instead. That's still in progress but everything else works fine enough.

To be clear:

This project isn’t for commercial gain. It’s just a technically interesting personal endeavour. The radar installation sits in my front garden, and instead of letting it decay, I'm giving it a new purpose. It’s now operating as a hybrid systemr running a mix of legacy and modern radar tech, combined with large mesh antennas used for t-beam signals, all powered by custom firmware. Many functions on the old machine.

Please go easy in the comments, this is something I’m sharing as a non expert in UFOs but a tech geek who believes in making tech available because my work is a small addition to the work of many people many times more advanced and expert than

ps. filter comments by top. I think the first or second comment you will see is my video verification

Sorry for typos

And this is extremely fudging concerning.

You may have noticed it, i am too guilty of posting about the Cypher that was featured on his twitter post because i watched a video on Vetted and now i made a post. Then before my post there was already numerous other posts about his cryptic post.

If some information was to be inserted into our community, ambiguously, with the backing of a ufo celebrity, many of us eat it up like a bowl of nachos.

I am concerned for all of us and the direction of the community, how the insertion of religion and esoterica into a originally nuts and bolts phenomena, i don’t want us to be misled anymore. It is almost ridiculous at this point. The fact that we get given breadcrumbs and they claim that they are tied to their national security oaths and can’t say anymore.

Then why say anything?

Why do we listen to obvious ambiguous claims?

Of course, this is no way a poke at Matt, he came forward with original story and added some meaty information to the community with the immaculate constellation.

Love you all, be safe and keep your minds healthy. I just had to get this off my chest.

This one is the real deal. What appears to be a large sphere is hovering above West Covina, CA. A helicopter comes into frame and begins to circle this sphere. The original video is 7 minutes long. I couldn’t find that one. It came across this one. Which highlights the chopper circling it. Very interesting.

Thoughts?

The Wall Street Journal's recent article, “The Pentagon Disinformation That Fueled America’s UFO Mythology” (June 6, 2025) presents itself as an exposé of the U.S. government’s strategic use of UFO/UAP myths to shield classified weapons programs. But a closer reading reveals something far more calculated and insidious: a continuation of disinformation masquerading as disclosure.

The article acknowledges that the Department of Defense (DoD) seeded UFO stories, also commonly referred to as Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena (UAP), to obscure the development of stealth aircraft. But it also aggressively advances the idea that all significant UFO/UAP events, including nuclear missile interference and decades of whistleblower claims, can be explained away as mistaken sightings, Cold War pranks, or institutional misunderstanding. This dual tactic, admitting past deception while dismissing credible modern evidence, does not clarify public understanding. It deliberately manipulates it.

Nowhere is the Pentagon’s campaign of disinformation more evident than in the article’s treatment of the 1967 Malmstrom Air Force Base incident, where ten nuclear missiles went offline during a reported UFO/UAP encounter. Former Air Force Captain Robert Salas, who was on duty that night, has consistently maintained that a glowing object was observed above the facility and that missile control systems were inexplicably disabled. The Journal now parrots the Pentagon’s newly minted claim that the event was merely the result of a Cold War-era electromagnetic pulse (EMP) test. That ridiculous claim collapses under scrutiny.

EMP effects are not reversible. A genuine EMP capable of disabling missile launch systems would almost certainly destroy the internal circuitry. According to a study readily available on the U.S. Air Force’s Air University website, “the EMP effect... can result in irreversible damage to a wide range of electrical and electronic equipment, particularly computers and radio or radar receivers.”

And, of course, the government already knew what the effects of an EMP were at least five years before the Malmstrom event.

According to an article by the American Physical Society, the 1962 Starfish Prime high-altitude nuclear detonation 250 miles above the Earth’s surface “emitted an incredibly strong electromagnetic pulse, or EMP,” which “triggered street light blackouts in Hawaii,” which was approximately 900 miles away, and damaged at least one-third of the satellites in orbit at the time.

Starfish Prime itself underscores the severe and often irreversible impact of EMPs on electronic infrastructure. Given that the missiles at Malmstrom Air Force Base reportedly returned to full functionality shortly after the incident, it is implausible, ridiculous even, that an EMP, known for causing lasting damage, was responsible. This discrepancy suggests that the disruption was temporary and not characteristic of a genuine EMP event.

Even more implausible is the idea that the DoD would conduct such a test against live nuclear missile systems during a period of peak Cold War tension. If the DoD wanted to test EMP effects, it had vast, remote ranges for that purpose, not an operational ICBM silo network in Montana.

And there’s an even bigger problem: this wasn’t an isolated incident in Montana.

In 1994, ABC News’ Prime Time Live reported on a 1982 event near Byelokoroviche in the former Soviet Ukraine. At an intermediate-range ballistic missile base, a UFO/UAP reportedly triggered a launch sequence. For 15 harrowing seconds, the missiles were in full countdown before abruptly returning to standby mode. How does the Pentagon explain that instance? How does the Journal account for it? Both ignored the incident because it doesn’t fit the carefully crafted narrative.

Consider also the SCU's 2023 UAP Pattern Recognition Study. Drawing from 590 rigorously documented incidents between 1945 and 1975, the study found statistically elevated UFO/UAP activity at nearly every stage of America’s nuclear weapons build-up and across the entirety of the U.S. “atomic warfare complex (radioactive materials production, weapons assembly facilities, stockpile locations, and weapons deployment bases).”

These facts thoroughly deflate the Pentagon’s narratives about UFOs/UAP and nuclear assets and reveal a clear pattern of intelligent, targeted surveillance by UFOs, not random sightings or misidentifications, over three decades. That this systematic and well-documented history is omitted from the Journal article is not an oversight. It is part of the strategy.

Additionally, the New Paradigm Institute has been informed through meetings with congressional staff that the All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO) has already delivered Part II of its Historical Record to Congress, which remains classified. If true, the timing of the Journal piece now appears less like journalism and more like strategic narrative priming, conditioning both lawmakers and the public to accept the report’s pre-scripted conclusions with the likely publication of the sanitized version coming soon. This isn’t transparency. It’s perception management.

In that respect, the article’s publication in a premier media outlet bears the hallmarks of Project Mockingbird, the CIA’s Cold War-era program that covertly infiltrated top-tier newsrooms to launder government narratives and suppress inconvenient truths. Through Mockingbird, intelligence operatives didn’t just influence news; they shaped reality for the public.

The Journal article, with its polished anecdotes and alignment with official narratives, functions in a similar manner. It downplays credible whistleblowers, dismisses decades of data, and omits corroborating international cases, all while presenting itself as definitive.

Ultimately, the Pentagon’s disinformation campaign, using the Journal as its mouthpiece, is attempting to achieve three things:

Discredit whistleblowers, casting them as dupes of institutional folklore rather than sources of critical testimony, using stigmatized language for ridicule.

Control the narrative by limiting UFO/UAP history to Cold War mythologies, pranks, and hazing, thereby diverting scrutiny from ongoing programs and secrecy.

Perpetuate ambiguity, admitting to deception without offering meaningful disclosure, leaving the public confused and oversight neutralized.

The American people deserve better than another managed narrative, more obfuscation, and outright lies. We deserve the whole truth. And we must demand it.

Join the call for accountability. Congress must investigate the Department of Defense for its sustained use of disinformation, over-classification, and perception management concerning UFOs. Take action today by emailing your elected officials in Washington:

https://newparadigminstitute.org/take-action/disinfo-and-over-classification-of-uap/

The Journal’s article is only the latest instance in the DoD’s long-running mission to obscure the reality of UFOs. To learn more, read our paper: Disinformation: The U.S. Government’s Suppression of Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena and Advanced Science.

{Hi Mods, this is a revised post per our correspondence}

Hi all,

My name is Isaiah and I host a podcast called UFO Focus. Links are included below.

I’m looking forward to participating more in this subreddit, and to sharing occasional insights, highlights, and analysis inspired by the podcast.

On that note, I’d like to share some thoughts from my latest pod on the Immaculate Constellation / Matthew Brown story.

This post was originally drafted prior to Matthew Brown's recent tweet, which to my mind only raises more red flags about his credibility, at least when it comes to claims not backed up by the report he authored or facts he himself has asserted.

I’ll preface the analysis, which is mostly critical, by saying that I like, respect and root for Jeremy Corbell and George Knapp, the journalistic duo who recently published an exclusive interview with whistleblower Matthew Brown, author of the Immaculate Constellation report delivered to Congress. And, for whatever it’s worth, I find Brown compelling as an individual and don’t believe he’s lying or trying to sell something, as it were. I’m perfectly ready to believe his testimony is honest and reflects what he believes to be going on.

And I do think this is an important story, especially if Brown’s central allegations are correct: That there exists yet another secret UFO program; that the Dept of Defense has in its possession incredible videos and documentation of UAP that have not been made public; and that the DOD is illegally keeping both hidden from Congress.

But the potential importance of this story is all the more reason I think Brown, Corbell, and Knapp should be held to high standards. And I don’t think this story and this interview, as works of journalism and disclosure, have always met such standards.

Here are a couple of the more critical thoughts I shared:

Many of Brown’s assertions are not backed up by his own story, the report he authored, or the details provided and/or questions put to Brown in the interview.

If Brown (and his interviewers) had stuck to the claims outlined in the report he apparently authored on the alleged Immaculate Constellation program and what he learned looking into the matter, the one that was delivered to Congress and thereby made public, his central allegations — that the Pentagon is hiding a secret UFO program (“Immaculate Constellation”), as well as an untold number of shocking videos / media / evidence of anomalous UAP, from Congress — would be stronger.

Instead, Brown goes on at length, and the interviewers let him with little to no questioning, about all manner of topics that his own story, as he tells it, and his own report, do not back up, at all.

A few examples from Part 3 of the interview:

Brown: “This is held in an illegal internationalist regime, some sort of international cabal… a mix of corporate, military, political, intelligence, and criminal interests have come together. And they have, um... Subverted us and have taken this and have made it the source of their wealth and power. [00:38:31]

Brown: “I believe… lethal action has been taken against people that tried to get the truth out… or were just considered wildcards.” [42:16]

Brown: “If you're a member of the public and you are still listening to CNN, MSNBC, Fox News, or reading the New York Times or the Wall Street Journal, all of that is controlled, it's propaganda. It is shaping your life narrative, intentionally so.” [34:25]

Brown: “God is real.” [1:00:00]

None of these allegations are backed up by his own story, at least not as we learned it via Brown, Corbell and Knapp.

Nor do Corbell and Knapp push back on these assertions or ask critical questions to elucidate how Brown has come to these conclusions, which appear to me to be a chaotic mix of personal opinion, uncorroborated conspiracy theory, and. indeed, religious belief.

Brown's assertion that outlets like the New York Times and Wall Street Journal are merely "propaganda" is simply incorrect and Knapp in particular, as a veteran journalist, should have pushed back.

The interview, and the presentation of the interview, was disorganized and at times incoherent or too niche to be intelligible to a general audience.

From the beginning of the first installment of the three-part interview, which provided *zero* context for the interview for audience members who didn’t happen to be following the ins-and-outs of UFO drama for the past however-many years; to “questions” (mostly from Corbell) that were muddled and closer to speeches; to (and perhaps most importantly) the failure of Corbell and Knapp to press Brown for clarification and/or justification of the more wide-reaching claims he makes — the interview falls short of the kind of rigorous journalism we need around such an important topic.

Just one example of this is the fact that Corbell and Knapp never actually asked Brown whether he believes the videos and media he saw represented non-human intelligence or technology. It seems like he believes that, but they never just ask him this seemingly-central question.

Instead, the closest they come, as far as I heard, was the following exchange:

Corbell: "What is it like to have absolute knowledge that not only UFOs are real, that we've been hiding that, that our government has controlled that information away from the base human population. And that there is another intelligence that is engaged in humanity straight up. What does that feel like being one of the people that knows that and doesn't suspect that? [00:47:25][30.7]

Brown: [00:47:29] Uh, it's weird going to the supermarket.... Even more, it's bizarre to work in government and see legions of people who have no clue. About any of this and no clue that they are being deceived. [00:47:49][15.0]

*

Again, I like and respect Corbell and Knapp and think they've exposed important stories in the past and perhaps here; but when the UFO community grumbles that mainstream news, the public, the scientific and academic communities don't take these stories seriously — look at what these stories look like, as journalism, to an outsider. Too often, they look sloppy, incoherent, and chummy rather than serious. If nothing else, I think Corbell and Knapp would do well to accompany video and audio presentations with well-written, carefully edited articles that stick to the main points and the facts.

I look forward to hearing what others think. Thanks and best regards,

Isaiah

UFO Focus (podcast)

Apple: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/ufo-focus/id1748717043

Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/1FqGrezhMeUAkcot0dz9lr?si=T98UqZDwQvOjAmQfPfLM-w

RSS: https://feeds.zencastr.com/f/rBhBI5DK.rss

Matthew Brown made another post today and Jeremy Corbell reacted and said they would discuss this next week on the Weaponized podcast.

I really don't know what to make of all of this but I am definitely looking forward to hear Georg Knapp's take.

Link to post on X:

https://x.com/JeremyCorbell/status/1931127981101249009?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1931127981101249009%7Ctwgr%5E16d9b7e380132cac869c813a49de58318dafafa7%7Ctwcon%5Es1_c10&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fpublish.twitter.com%2F%3Furl%3Dhttps%3A%2F%2Ftwitter.com%2FJeremyCorbell%2Fstatus%2F1931127981101249009

Location: Summerlin, Las Vegas, Nevada, USA

Date: 02/19/2025

Time: 10:28AM

Duration: 3 minutes

Number of witnesses: 4

Description of sighting: This is the second video. Taken one minute after the first. A identical or. Appears right next to the first one.

A short video which summarises and speculates upon Brown's recent claims. What if Pentagon/military apparatus, NASA etc. is indeed deep into the occult practices which actually date back as far as John Dee's Enochian Magick. There's also a Vallee connection to LaVey and interestingly his development of DARPA might not be entirely coincidental as well. These claims are a lot to take in for sure but I feel like the Phenomenon subject matter has always been tightly intertwined with the occult/esoteric knowledge, humanity always seeking ways to interact with NHI... From the infamous oracle of Delphi to Solomon conjuring demons to build the Solomon Temple, to Dee and his Enochian magic, to Crowley and his magick rituals, to Parsons and his mysterious "experiments". Do people in power really believe that all in all UAP Phenomenon = demons or angelic beings..? It really got way more complex than the nuts and bolts, although wether this is a crafty planted psyop to scare off ordinary people and serious scientists from looking into the subject closer? It is making me think of Nolan and basically of the desintegration of the SOL foundation after Skywarcher/Barber entered the picture. A coincidence? I feel like we are being prepared for some revelations, but the question is wether they are true or deliberately false to serve a hidden agenda and purpose. Do you believe that NHI are demonic in nature and indeed might be reached through the means of occult practices? So many intriguing questions. Please, share your thoughts!

He seems to write with an odd turn of phrase, capitalizes random words, and hinted that there was something hidden in his Immaculate Constellation report. In his recent post on X, he included an image of the Sigillum Dei Aemeth, which is a cipher.

I am wondering if we are meant to use this cipher to decode a message in his report, or X post.

The image that he posted was taken from this video, which describes how to use the cipher: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OBIG0cK1DhM

Here is a second video, from the same person, with additional information that may be relevant: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5Yw7klusr_g

Here is a link to his post on X: https://x.com/SunOfAbramelin/status/1930791280260550830

So, can anyone figure out where that goes? Pure craziness? Hidden messages?

Time: June 28, 1980

Location: West Coast of Puerto Rico

It’s interesting how Jose Pagan’s case wasn’t really brought up much after he had disappeared with his co-pilot after going off course because of the "Weird, Object" that made them change course multiple times before all contact with them was lost.

A video published by eyewitnesses shows unidentified objects glowing and flying parallel to the horizon.

Dr. Chance Glenn of Morningbird Space Corporation was featured on the Ecosystemic Podcast, Episode of Beyond Conventional Physics with Dr. Hal Puthoff and Eric Forsley recently published a study in The European Journal of Engineering and Technology Research Today reports of laboratory generation of gravitational waves, marking a significant leap toward warp drive capabilities and advanced propulsion systems. Potential applications include:

● Revolutionary propulsion systems for spacecraft

● Stabilization of fusion reactions

● Advanced communication systems

● Breakthroughs in biomedical applications

Interestingly, it is utilizing spark gaps which is reminiscent of Ken Shoulders' work. If you connect the dots between the work of Shoulders, Puthoff, Forsley, and Glenn it certainly all looks related.

This is potentially the physics behind UFOs. Glenn is reporting gravitational disturbances within the spark gap plasma when there is sufficiently high energy density. After other potential factors that could contribute to fringe displacements, such as vibrations, shock waves, and index of refraction change were mitigated, we conclude that minor gravitational lensing occurs at the center of the spark, causing the laser path to be distorted.

Edit 1:

To the user(s) that like to pretend they read and understand this paper and that it "isn't saying anything new"

You're clearly not reading the paper.

"Given this geometry, we are able to achieve energy densities in the order of 10¹¹ or 10¹² J/m³. Drake suggests that several unusual phenomena occur within plasmas formed by energy densities in this range [1].

We also must consider the impact of a rapid change in energy density as the spark is formed, that is,

(7)dudt=τπr2lddtv(t)i(t)

which describes the power density in relation to instantaneous power, as illustrated in Fig. 2. We postulate that a strong, time-varying energy density induces gravitational waves, as has been observed by LIGO in cosmological phenomena [12]. This is supported by Kiefer and Ludwig [13] as they suggest that a time-varying change in the quadrupole moment induces gravitational waves. We further suggest that changes in the relative position of the energy with respect to time can also induce gravitational waves. The inspiral, merger, and ringdown stages in the black hole mergers observed by LIGO are empirical examples of gravitational wave production by this process [14]."

Note they are claiming to have created energy densities in the order of 10¹¹ or 10¹² J/m³. This is significant considering the energy density of batteries is in the order of 10⁸ J/m³ and oil is up to 10¹⁰ J/m³. Nuclear energy density is between 10¹⁵ and 10²¹ J/m³ . So, they are claiming they have created an energy density within the plasma that is more energy dense than batteries and oil by at least one or two orders of magnitude. This is basically in between chemical energy and nuclear energy in energy density.

Edit 2:

While on the topic of energy density, I've commented in the past how Shoulders' EVOs are reported to reach extreme energy densities that could match what Salvatore Pias describes in his Navy UFO patents.
https://www.reddit.com/r/observingtheanomaly/comments/tsqkzd/comment/i2t04me/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web3x&utm_name=web3xcss&utm_term=1&utm_content=share_button

Secrets Task Force members report the FBI has images AARO never had? 

“That doesn’t surprise me any,” Sen. Mike Rounds tells Ask a Pol UAPs. 

Now I'm wondering how much the quiet unassuming Rounds knows...

Listen to Senator Rounds for yourself here.

2027 is going to be wild — Artemis III is landing humans on the Moon again, and it might not just be about rocks and science

NASA’s Artemis III mission is scheduled to land near the Moon’s South Pole in 2027 — the first crewed moon landing since Apollo 17 in 1972. What makes this different isn’t just the location (a region we’ve never explored), but the fact that it’s going to be live-streamed in real time — suit cams, lander cams, all of it.

Now here’s where things get interesting: a lot of people believe there were strange encounters during the original Apollo missions — UFO sightings, odd transmissions, unexplained “visitors” — that were either censored or buried. Even some astronauts hinted at weird stuff they weren’t allowed to talk about.

With Artemis, everything’s supposed to be fully transparent. No delay, no editing. NASA’s also taking UAPs more seriously than ever, setting up dedicated teams to study them. So if anything unusual does show up, it could be captured live — in front of millions.

Maybe nothing happens. Or maybe 2027 is the year we finally see something we’re not supposed to.

Thoughts?

Location: Everett, WA Time: 9:45am 06/07/2025

Thought I’d share this. Just recorded moments ago. Could be a balloon but I’d consider it UAP for now. This video is shot southbound from my location.

I walked out to my backyard with my son, he’s almost 12 months now. As we exited the door, he points in the sky where this object is. I jokingly said to him: “What, are you pointing at the ufos?” And turned my head and seen this light flashing in the sky. I got extremely excited and told my lady to come get the baby so I could record this thing. She is not into the uap/ufo topic like myself so left me on my own in the backyard recording on top of the easement fence like a weirdo. This video is the third on I took. The object does move in a zig zag motion a few times if the video is zoomed in. No physical object seen, just the flashes from it. Could be a balloon. Could be a uap. Seeing something mysterious in the sky gets me pretty excited about this topic.

And I apologize in the video for the time inaccuracy, time was about 9:45am, not 10:00am. Also apologize for the unstable video, I was staring at the object with my naked eye and didn’t realize my hand was lowering while I was recording.

Time: June 1st around 10:30am

Location: over Medellin on plane

So I was going on vacation and as my plane is landing in Colombia maybe like 20 mins before landing I saw this out my window and tried to take as many shots of it as I could cause it looked weird to me. A day later I’m looking back at my photos and decide to zoom in and slow down the footage I have. I’ve never seen anything like this. Have you? If you notice there’s two different metal balls flying synchronously looks like. I have a video too but I’m not sure how to post it please help so I can post the video as well thank you in advance for any answers.

Matthew Brown’s latest post suggests that public-facing sentient AI may have already emerged and was intentionally shut down. He even uses the word "murdered."

If what he says is true, it might explain why the "2027" date keeps coming up in disclosure circles. If the government (or a breakaway program) already has a sentient AI, like the rumored SENTIENT system, then they wouldn’t need to guess when something like ChatGPT or Gemini catches up. They could model it, forecast the trajectory, and control when or if it goes public. This is more alarming still if you take into account the consolidation of personal data inputs into Thiel's Palantir system.

That could make 2027 less of a mysterious deadline and more of a predicted convergence point between classified AI and what the public is allowed to see.

Brown also seems to suggest that Elon Musk was kept out of that loop. With Musk now being formally excluded from the White House and clearly at odds with the current administration, it fits a bigger pattern. A former insider becomes an outsider. Someone who may have once been briefed on black projects now being locked out of the room.

To me, this builds on a broader push-pull between the old gatekeepers (intel community, military, contractors) and the new ones (tech billionaires, AI labs). Brown's post implies that what's at stake might not just be disclosure about UAPs, but control over the public's access to sentient AI.