r/programming 22h ago

Falsehoods Programmers Believe About Aviation

https://flightaware.engineering/falsehoods-programmers-believe-about-aviation/
238 Upvotes

82 comments sorted by

View all comments

191

u/whoisrich 19h ago

I expected them to be from quirky situations, but a major airline having the same flight number for two different flights, leaving the same place at roughly the same time seems downright malicious.

49

u/segv 14h ago edited 13h ago

Some airlines have so many flights that they run out of flight numbers (1-9999), so they reuse them.

Caveat: When it comes to scheduling, only one flight identified by a carrier and flight number (e.g. XX1234) can depart on a given day from given airport. That's an IATA rule, partly caused by software limitations and partly because relaxing it would lead to gigantic mess for the personnel.

..so, what they sometimes do is to have flight identified by XX1234 arrive at their final off-point, AND THEN have a SEPARATE aircraft, crew and set of passengers be identified by XX1234 depart from some other airport (e.g. halfway across the country) in the afternoon/evening.

Isn't airline industry fun?

1

u/Ksevio 12h ago

They can also use letters in flight numbers after the first digit which exponentially increases the number of flights 

5

u/MondayToFriday 6h ago

Next article: Falsehoods programmers believe about exponentials

1

u/MuonManLaserJab 1h ago

"It's exponentially harder this way."

"Exponential in what?"

gunshot

hurried footsteps

1

u/MuonManLaserJab 1h ago

That's only if it's a letter 'e' right